vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) and Omnicom Group (OMC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Omnicom Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.2B vs $4.5B, roughly 1.4× Canadian Solar Inc.). Omnicom Group runs the higher net margin — 6.7% vs 1.3%, a 5.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Canadian Solar Inc. is a global renewable energy company. Headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario, the company manufactures solar PV modules, provides battery energy storage solutions and develops utility-scale solar power and battery energy storage projects.
Omnicom Group Inc. is an American global media, marketing, and corporate communications holding company, headquartered in New York City.
CSIQ vs OMC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.5B | $6.2B |
| Net Profit | $57.6M | $418.7M |
| Gross Margin | 17.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | 10.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.3% | 6.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -16.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 436.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $418.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-941.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.6M | $341.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.6M | $257.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.2M | $287.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $448.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $366.8M | $385.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $304.4M | $328.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.5% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 16.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.7% | 17.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 12.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.9B | — |
| Total Assets | $13.5B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $54.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5B | $28.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.5B | $28.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.5B | $28.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9B | $28.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9B | $27.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-187.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -3.26× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-187.7M | $477.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $210.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-786.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $568.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-141.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $438.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-816.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $537.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-180.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 54.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.26× | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
