vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caesarstone Ltd. (CSTE) and HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($114.8M vs $94.4M, roughly 1.2× Caesarstone Ltd.). HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -46.8% vs -93.1%, a 46.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.2% CAGR vs -57.8%).
Caesarstone Ltd., is a publicly traded company that engages in the production and marketing of quartz, porcelain, mineral and advanced fusion surfaces used for kitchen countertops, vanity tops, flooring, wall cladding and general interior design. The company was founded in 1987 and is traded on the NASDAQ in New York (CSTE). Headquarters are located in Kibbutz Sdot Yam in Israel. Production facilities are in Israel and India with third party manufactured product sourced from factories in the ...
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) is a specialized investment firm focused on sustainable infrastructure assets covering renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable real estate and low-carbon utility segments. It primarily operates in North American markets, providing long-term capital to eligible sustainable projects and delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors through recurring cash flows from operational underlying assets.
CSTE vs HASI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $94.4M | $114.8M |
| Net Profit | $-87.9M | $-53.8M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -87.2% | -57.4% |
| Net Margin | -93.1% | -46.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 13.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -176.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.55 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $94.4M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $345.4M | $103.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.7M | $85.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $101.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $436.7M | $82.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.3M | $94.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.6M | $105.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-87.9M | $-53.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.5M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.3M | $98.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-57.4M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-56.6M | $26.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | $123.0M |
| Q4 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -87.2% | -57.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 84.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 90.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.6% | -32.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | 39.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -93.1% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.4% | 80.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.0% | 114.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.1% | -23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.2% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.6% | 116.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.55 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.54 | $0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.41 | $0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.67 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.64 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.11 | $0.98 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $58.4M | $110.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $139.2M | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $398.4M | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $58.4M | $110.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $301.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $86.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $67.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $129.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $44.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $145.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $61.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $139.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $271.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $315.1M | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $398.4M | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $549.0M | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $549.0M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $579.9M | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $579.9M | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $579.9M | $6.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.04× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-38.0M | $167.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -49.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $38.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-38.0M | $167.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $-121.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.7M | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-37.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.3M | $21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.1M | $-24.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | $20.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -49.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.94× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTE
| America's | $53.0M | 56% |
| USA | $41.4M | 44% |
HASI
Segment breakdown not available.
