vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. (CSW) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($233.0M vs $143.3M, roughly 1.6× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 4.4% vs -31.4%, a 35.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.3% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (5.1% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
CSW vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $233.0M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $10.3M | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | 39.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.3% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -61.9% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $233.0M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.0M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $263.6M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $230.5M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.6M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.9M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226.2M | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.3M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.7M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.1M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.9M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.41 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.43 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.05 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.60 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.26 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.47 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.2M | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.2M | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.5M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $225.8M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.8M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $273.2M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $800.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.2M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.75× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $22.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.6% | 110.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.81× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $162.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.9M | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.8M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.6M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.8M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.7M | $66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 110.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSW
| Contractor Solutions Segment | $166.3M | 71% |
| Specialized Reliability Solutions Segment | $38.2M | 16% |
| Engineered Building Solutions Segment | $28.5M | 12% |
PDM
Segment breakdown not available.
