vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. (CSW) and PHOTRONICS INC (PLAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($233.0M vs $210.4M, roughly 1.1× PHOTRONICS INC). PHOTRONICS INC runs the higher net margin — 10.9% vs 4.4%, a 6.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.3% vs -5.5%). PHOTRONICS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($25.2M vs $22.7M). Over the past eight quarters, CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (5.1% CAGR vs -3.8%).
Photronics, Inc. is an American semiconductor photomask manufacturer. It was the third largest photomask supplier globally as of 2009. Photronics is a member of the eBeam Initiative.
CSW vs PLAB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $233.0M | $210.4M |
| Net Profit | $10.3M | $22.9M |
| Gross Margin | 39.7% | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 22.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | 10.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.3% | -5.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -61.9% | -32.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $233.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.0M | $210.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $263.6M | $211.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $230.5M | $212.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.6M | $222.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.9M | $211.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226.2M | $217.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.9M | $216.3M |
| Q4 25 | $10.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.7M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.1M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.9M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $36.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.8M | $26.2M |
| Q4 25 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.0% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | 36.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.2% | 35.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | 37.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.6% | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.5% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.4% | 36.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.8% | 26.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.3% | 25.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.3% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.0% | 26.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.1% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.41 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.43 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.05 | $0.68 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.60 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.26 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.47 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.03 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.2M | $575.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $16.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $40.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.5M | $575.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.0M | $558.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $225.8M | $642.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.8M | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $273.2M | $606.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $559.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | $521.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $800.1M | $21.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.0M | $2.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $615.7M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.75× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.9M | $50.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $22.7M | $25.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.8% | 12.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.6% | 11.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.81× | 2.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $162.0M | $64.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.8M | $50.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.6M | $31.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | $78.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $68.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.8M | $75.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.7M | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.4M | $41.5M |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $-29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.8M | $43.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $25.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.6M | $56.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $-1.8M |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 24.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.3% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | -0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.52× | 2.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.48× | 3.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | 1.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.43× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | 1.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSW
| Contractor Solutions Segment | $166.3M | 71% |
| Specialized Reliability Solutions Segment | $38.2M | 16% |
| Engineered Building Solutions Segment | $28.5M | 12% |
PLAB
| High End Integrated Circuits | $53.6M | 25% |
| High End Flat Panel Displays | $53.5M | 25% |
| KR | $43.7M | 21% |
| Other | $42.1M | 20% |
| Mainstream Flat Panel Displays | $9.1M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 4% |
