vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. (CSW) and TRUSTMARK CORP (TRMK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($233.0M vs $204.1M, roughly 1.1× TRUSTMARK CORP). TRUSTMARK CORP runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs 4.4%, a 23.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.3% vs 4.5%). TRUSTMARK CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($232.0M vs $22.7M). Over the past eight quarters, TRUSTMARK CORP's revenue compounded faster (8.9% CAGR vs 5.1%).
Trustmark is an insurance company. According to Crain's Chicago Business magazine, Trustmark ranks #69 among Chicago's Largest Privately Held Companies in 2018.
CSW vs TRMK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $233.0M | $204.1M |
| Net Profit | $10.3M | $57.9M |
| Gross Margin | 39.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 34.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | 28.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.3% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -61.9% | 2.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.62 | $0.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $233.0M | $204.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.0M | $202.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $263.6M | $198.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $230.5M | $194.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.6M | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.9M | $192.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226.2M | $141.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $210.9M | $172.2M |
| Q4 25 | $10.3M | $57.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.7M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | $55.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.1M | $53.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.9M | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.6M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.8M | $41.5M |
| Q4 25 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 34.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.8% | 34.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.3% | 41.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | 32.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.3% | -98.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.0% | 26.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.1% | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.62 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.41 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.43 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.05 | $0.88 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.60 | $0.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.26 | $0.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.47 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.03 | $0.68 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $18.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $40.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $225.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $273.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $800.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $615.7M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $18.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $18.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $18.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $18.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $18.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $18.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.9M | $243.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $22.7M | $232.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.8% | 113.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.6% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.81× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $162.0M | $409.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.9M | $243.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.8M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.6M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | $82.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $116.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.8M | $59.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.7M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.4M | $-58.5M |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $232.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | $62.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.7M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.8M | $80.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $93.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.6M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $-63.6M |
| Q4 25 | 9.8% | 113.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 41.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | -36.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.81× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.52× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.48× | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.43× | 2.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | -1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSW
| Contractor Solutions Segment | $166.3M | 71% |
| Specialized Reliability Solutions Segment | $38.2M | 16% |
| Engineered Building Solutions Segment | $28.5M | 12% |
TRMK
Segment breakdown not available.
