vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $6.0B, roughly 1.1× Danaher Corporation). Danaher Corporation runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs 7.8%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cintas posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.9% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Cintas's revenue compounded faster (61.2% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
Danaher CorporationDHREarnings & Financial Report
Danaher Corporation is an American healthcare company headquartered in Washington, D.C.. It develops products used for advances in biotechnology, life sciences, and diagnostics. The company operates three divisions: biotechnology, which develops products for the development of therapeutics; life sciences, which develops products to identify causes of disease, new therapies, and to test and manufacture new drugs, vaccines and gene editing technologies; and diagnostics, which develops instruments,...
CTAS vs DHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $6.0B |
| Net Profit | $502.5M | $1.0B |
| Gross Margin | 83.1% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 22.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 17.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.9% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.4% | 7.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.24 | $1.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $5.7B |
| Q1 26 | $502.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $908.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $954.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $818.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $907.0M |
| Q1 26 | 83.1% | 60.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | 58.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | 58.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 59.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | 61.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | 58.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.7% |
| Q1 26 | 10.3% | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 20.3% |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 15.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.24 | $1.45 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $1.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | $1.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $1.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $183.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | — |
| Total Assets | — | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $183.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $18.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $16.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $16.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $17.0B |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $52.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $51.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $52.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $50.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $49.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $51.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $49.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $83.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $79.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $81.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $79.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $77.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $80.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $78.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.3B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.7% | 4.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.12× | 1.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.5B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | 3.12× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | 1.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 1.86× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 1.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
