vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and MARKEL GROUP INC. (MKL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $3.6B, roughly 1.8× MARKEL GROUP INC.). MARKEL GROUP INC. runs the higher net margin — 16.1% vs 7.8%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cintas posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.9% vs -6.9%). Cintas produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.3B vs $599.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Cintas's revenue compounded faster (61.2% CAGR vs -10.5%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
MARKEL GROUP INC.MKLEarnings & Financial Report
Markel Group Inc. is a group of companies headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, and originally founded in 1930 as an insurance company.
CTAS vs MKL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $3.6B |
| Net Profit | $502.5M | $576.8M |
| Gross Margin | 83.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 22.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.9% | -6.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.4% | 5.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.24 | $48.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | $502.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $576.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $751.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $657.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $121.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $549.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $905.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $267.7M |
| Q1 26 | 83.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $48.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $59.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $49.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | $12.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $39.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $66.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $18.62 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $183.2M | $4.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $18.6B |
| Total Assets | — | $68.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $183.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $4.4B |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $18.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $18.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $17.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $17.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $16.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $17.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $15.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $68.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $67.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $66.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $64.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $61.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $62.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $59.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 0.24× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | $662.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.3B | $599.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.7% | 16.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.7% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.12× | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.5B | $2.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $662.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $504.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $376.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $493.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $890.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $578.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $599.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $453.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | $335.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $420.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | $838.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $521.4M |
| Q1 26 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 14.1% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | 3.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 0.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 2.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
Segment breakdown not available.
MKL
| Industrial | $1.6B | 45% |
| Consumer And Other | $958.3M | 27% |
| Financial | $737.0M | 21% |
| Other | $198.8M | 6% |
| Corporate Operations | $52.0M | 1% |
| Revenue From Contract With Customer | $10.5M | 0% |
