vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and NEWELL BRANDS INC. (NWL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $1.9B, roughly 3.4× NEWELL BRANDS INC.). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs -16.6%, a 24.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cintas posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.9% vs -2.7%). Cintas produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.3B vs $91.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Cintas's revenue compounded faster (61.2% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
Newell Brands Inc. is an American conglomerate of consumer and commercial products. The company's brands and products include Rubbermaid storage/or waste disposal containers; home organization and reusable container products; Contigo and Bubba water bottles; Coleman outdoor products; writing instruments glue ; children's products ; cookware and small appliances and fragrance products.
CTAS vs NWL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $502.5M | $-315.0M |
| Gross Margin | 83.1% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | -14.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | -16.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.9% | -2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.4% | -483.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.24 | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $502.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $-315.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $-54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $-198.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $45.0M |
| Q1 26 | 83.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.4% |
| Q1 26 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | -14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | -2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $183.2M | $203.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | — | $10.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $183.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $229.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $219.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $494.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $382.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $12.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6B | $161.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.3B | $91.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.7% | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.7% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.5B | $17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $161.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $374.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $-58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $-213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $282.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $32.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $91.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | $315.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $-117.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | $-272.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $-21.0M |
| Q1 26 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | -17.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 17.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
Segment breakdown not available.
NWL
| Kitchen | $538.0M | 28% |
| Writing | $370.0M | 20% |
| Commercial | $320.0M | 17% |
| Financial Institution Two | $286.0M | 15% |
| Baby | $259.0M | 14% |
| Outdoor And Recreation | $142.0M | 7% |
