vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cintas (CTAS) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cintas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $2.6B, roughly 1.1× Vertiv Holdings Co). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 14.7%, a 3.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs 9.3%). Vertiv Holdings Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($652.8M vs $425.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Vertiv Holdings Co's revenue compounded faster (16.5% CAGR vs 7.9%).
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
Vertiv is an American multinational provider of critical infrastructure and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments.
CTAS vs VRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $2.6B |
| Net Profit | $495.3M | $390.1M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.7% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 30.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | 137.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.21 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $390.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.3M | $445.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.1M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.3M | $324.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $463.5M | $164.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.5M | $147.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.3M | $178.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.4% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | 33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.8% | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.1% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 17.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $1.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $1.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.08 | $0.83 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.13 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.09 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.00 | $0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $200.8M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5B | $4.2B |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $13.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.4M | $908.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.0M | $579.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.1B | $12.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $10.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $9.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $8.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | 1.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.50× | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.47× | 1.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $531.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $425.0M | $652.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.2% | 24.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.8B | $2.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $531.2M | $978.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.5M | $508.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.7M | $322.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.0M | $303.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.4M | $425.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $466.7M | $378.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.0M | $378.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $652.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.0M | $885.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.5M | $463.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $522.1M | $266.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.0M | $364.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.8M | $341.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.1M | $344.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 17.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.34× | 1.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 2.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 2.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.67× | 2.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |
VRT
Segment breakdown not available.