vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Claritev Corp (CTEV) and Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($420.0M vs $246.6M, roughly 1.7× Claritev Corp). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs -32.7%, a 89.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs 6.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs 2.5%).
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
CTEV vs GLPI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $246.6M | $420.0M |
| Net Profit | $-80.6M | $239.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | 79.4% |
| Net Margin | -32.7% | 57.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.2% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 41.6% | 40.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.88 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $246.6M | $407.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $246.0M | $397.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $241.6M | $394.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $231.3M | $395.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.1M | $389.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.5M | $385.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.5M | $380.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $239.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-80.6M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-69.8M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-62.6M | $151.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-71.3M | $165.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-138.0M | $223.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-391.4M | $184.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-576.7M | $208.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | 89.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 65.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -146.7% | 70.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -224.4% | 77.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -32.7% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.4% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.9% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.8% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.4% | 57.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -169.8% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -247.0% | 54.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.88 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.23 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.81 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.38 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.49 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.25 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.78 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.8M | $274.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-173.9M | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $274.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $560.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.6M | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $6.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-173.9M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-101.8M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-39.9M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $207.6M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $603.4M | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1B | $12.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $11.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 304.87× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.67× | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.73× | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.48× | 1.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $66.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.2M | $293.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-30.1M | $252.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.8M | $270.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.5M | $252.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.3M | $183.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | $272.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-68.9M | $239.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-63.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.1M | $261.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.0M | $245.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.6% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.2% | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.8% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.5% | 275.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 64.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.9% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
