vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Claritev Corp (CTEV) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Claritev Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($246.6M vs $142.2M, roughly 1.7× UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\). UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs -32.7%, a 57.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Claritev Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.2% vs -14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Claritev Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.5% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
CTEV vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $246.6M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | $-80.6M | $35.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | 30.1% |
| Net Margin | -32.7% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.2% | -14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 41.6% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.88 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $246.6M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $246.0M | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $241.6M | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $231.3M | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.1M | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.5M | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.5M | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-80.6M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-69.8M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-62.6M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-71.3M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-138.0M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-391.4M | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-576.7M | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -146.7% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -224.4% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -32.7% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.4% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.9% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.8% | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -169.8% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -247.0% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.88 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.23 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.81 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.38 | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.49 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.25 | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.78 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.8M | $516.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-173.9M | — |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $516.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.8M | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2M | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.4M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.1M | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.6M | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-173.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-101.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-39.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $207.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $603.4M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 304.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.67× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.48× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $66.3M | $108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.3M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.2M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-30.1M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.4M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.8M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.5M | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.4M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.3M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-68.9M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-63.8M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.1M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.0M | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.6% | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.2% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.7% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.9% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTEV
Segment breakdown not available.
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
