vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cytek Biosciences, Inc. (CTKB) and Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Global Net Lease, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($117.0M vs $62.1M, roughly 1.9× Cytek Biosciences, Inc.). Global Net Lease, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.2% vs -70.9%, a 112.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cytek Biosciences, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs -15.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Cytek Biosciences, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.7% CAGR vs -11.1%).
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-performance flow cytometry systems, associated reagents and analysis software. Its solutions serve life science research, clinical diagnostics and biopharmaceutical sectors, with a global customer base across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
Global Net Lease, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that acquires, owns and manages a diversified portfolio of commercial real estate assets under long-term net lease contracts. Its property portfolio spans North America and Europe, covering industrial, office, retail and other key sectors, serving tenants across multiple industries to deliver consistent long-term returns for shareholders.
CTKB vs GNL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $117.0M |
| Net Profit | $-44.1M | $48.2M |
| Gross Margin | 52.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -9.0% | 94.7% |
| Net Margin | -70.9% | 41.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | -15.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -557.1% | 838.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $62.1M | $117.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | $121.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.6M | $124.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.5M | $132.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.5M | $137.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.5M | $138.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.6M | $145.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.9M | $147.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-44.1M | $48.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $-60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.6M | $-24.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $-189.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.6M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $941.0K | $-65.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.4M | $-35.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.2M | $-23.8M |
| Q4 25 | 52.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -9.0% | 94.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.6% | -11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.3% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.1% | -21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 40.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.3% | 42.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.9% | 38.6% |
| Q4 25 | -70.9% | 41.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.5% | -49.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.2% | -19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.5% | -143.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | -4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | -47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.4% | -24.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.8% | -16.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $90.9M | $180.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $341.7M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $461.5M | $4.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $90.9M | $180.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.3M | $165.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.5M | $144.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.3M | $147.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.7M | $159.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.3M | $127.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.9M | $122.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $168.8M | $131.9M |
| Q4 25 | $341.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $378.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $377.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $379.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $385.5M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $389.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $392.6M | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $461.5M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $494.9M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $493.3M | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $482.6M | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $499.5M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $491.2M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $483.7M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.1M | $8.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-771.0K | $222.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-771.0K | $222.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.9M | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0K | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-125.0K | $59.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $299.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | $62.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $92.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-974.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTKB
| Products | $46.6M | 75% |
| Services | $15.5M | 25% |
GNL
| Industrial And Distribution Segment | $56.0M | 48% |
| Office Segment | $30.8M | 26% |
| Single Tenant Retail Segment | $30.2M | 26% |
