vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cytek Biosciences, Inc. (CTKB) and GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP (GOOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.1M vs $43.5M, roughly 1.4× GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP). GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs -70.9%, a 83.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.3% vs 8.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Cytek Biosciences, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.7% CAGR vs 10.3%).
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-performance flow cytometry systems, associated reagents and analysis software. Its solutions serve life science research, clinical diagnostics and biopharmaceutical sectors, with a global customer base across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
Gladstone Commercial Corp is a publicly traded US real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning, and operating diversified industrial and commercial properties. It offers long-term net lease agreements to tenants across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and professional services sectors, mainly serving small to mid-sized business clients.
CTKB vs GOOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $43.5M |
| Net Profit | $-44.1M | $5.4M |
| Gross Margin | 52.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -9.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -70.9% | 12.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 16.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -557.1% | -25.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $62.1M | $43.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.6M | $39.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.5M | $37.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.5M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.5M | $39.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.6M | $37.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.9M | $35.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-44.1M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.6M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $941.0K | $11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.4M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.2M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 52.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -70.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.8% | 9.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $90.9M | $10.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $843.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $341.7M | $171.8M |
| Total Assets | $461.5M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.91× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $90.9M | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.3M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.3M | $10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.7M | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.3M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.9M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $168.8M | $10.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $843.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $843.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $794.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $740.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $693.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $692.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $722.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $719.4M |
| Q4 25 | $341.7M | $171.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $378.6M | $184.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $377.6M | $177.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $379.6M | $183.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.7M | $171.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $385.5M | $168.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $389.1M | $145.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $392.6M | $147.3M |
| Q4 25 | $461.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $494.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $493.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $482.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $499.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $491.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $483.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.1M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.88× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-771.0K | $88.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 16.38× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-771.0K | $88.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0K | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-125.0K | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $57.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-974.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | 7.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.05× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTKB
| Products | $46.6M | 75% |
| Services | $15.5M | 25% |
GOOD
Segment breakdown not available.