vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cytek Biosciences, Inc. (CTKB) and Information Services Group Inc. (III). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.1M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.0× Information Services Group Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -70.9%, a 75.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cytek Biosciences, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 5.9%). Information Services Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.3M vs $-1.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Cytek Biosciences, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.7% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-performance flow cytometry systems, associated reagents and analysis software. Its solutions serve life science research, clinical diagnostics and biopharmaceutical sectors, with a global customer base across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
CTKB vs III — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $61.2M |
| Net Profit | $-44.1M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 52.9% | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | -9.0% | 8.4% |
| Net Margin | -70.9% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -557.1% | -14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $62.1M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.6M | $61.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.5M | $59.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.5M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.5M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.6M | $64.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.9M | $64.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-44.1M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $941.0K | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.4M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.2M | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | 52.9% | 44.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.7% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.3% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.6% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.5% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.3% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.6% | 39.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.3% | 36.1% |
| Q4 25 | -9.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.9% | -3.7% |
| Q4 25 | -70.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.8% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $90.9M | $28.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $341.7M | $94.7M |
| Total Assets | $461.5M | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $90.9M | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.3M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.5M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.3M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.7M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $168.8M | $14.0M |
| Q4 25 | $341.7M | $94.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $378.6M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $377.6M | $94.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $379.6M | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.7M | $96.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $385.5M | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $389.1M | $95.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $392.6M | $95.6M |
| Q4 25 | $461.5M | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $494.9M | $213.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $493.3M | $200.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $482.6M | $202.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $499.5M | $204.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $491.2M | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $483.7M | $235.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.1M | $234.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-771.0K | $5.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.8M | $4.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.9% | 7.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.8M | $25.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-771.0K | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.9M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0K | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-125.0K | $978.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-974.0K | $141.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | -2.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.7% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.2% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.05× | 7.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTKB
| Products | $46.6M | 75% |
| Services | $15.5M | 25% |
III
Segment breakdown not available.
