vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cytek Biosciences, Inc. (CTKB) and ThredUp Inc. (TDUP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ThredUp Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($79.7M vs $62.1M, roughly 1.3× Cytek Biosciences, Inc.). ThredUp Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.0% vs -70.9%, a 63.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ThredUp Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.5% vs 8.1%). Cytek Biosciences, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.8M vs $-3.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Cytek Biosciences, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.7% CAGR vs 11.1%).
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-performance flow cytometry systems, associated reagents and analysis software. Its solutions serve life science research, clinical diagnostics and biopharmaceutical sectors, with a global customer base across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
ThredUp Inc. is an American company that operates an online resale platform specializing in the sale of second-hand clothing, footwear, and accessories. Founded in 2009 and headquartered in Oakland, California, it has established itself as one of the leading resale fashion marketplaces.
CTKB vs TDUP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $79.7M |
| Net Profit | $-44.1M | $-5.6M |
| Gross Margin | 52.9% | 79.6% |
| Operating Margin | -9.0% | -8.4% |
| Net Margin | -70.9% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 18.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -557.1% | 74.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $62.1M | $79.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.6M | $77.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.5M | $71.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.5M | $67.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.5M | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.6M | $66.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.9M | $64.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-44.1M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.6M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.6M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $941.0K | $-24.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.4M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.2M | $-16.6M |
| Q4 25 | 52.9% | 79.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.7% | 79.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.3% | 79.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.6% | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.5% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.3% | 79.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.6% | 78.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.3% | 80.1% |
| Q4 25 | -9.0% | -8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.6% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.3% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.1% | -7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | -12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.2% | -17.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.3% | -14.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.9% | -19.2% |
| Q4 25 | -70.9% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.5% | -5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.2% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.5% | -7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | -32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | -40.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.4% | -20.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.8% | -25.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $90.9M | $38.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $341.7M | $59.2M |
| Total Assets | $461.5M | $167.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $90.9M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.3M | $46.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.5M | $41.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.3M | $41.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.7M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.3M | $43.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.9M | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $168.8M | $50.1M |
| Q4 25 | $341.7M | $59.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $378.6M | $59.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $377.6M | $60.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $379.6M | $56.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.7M | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $385.5M | $69.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $389.1M | $86.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $392.6M | $93.5M |
| Q4 25 | $461.5M | $167.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $494.9M | $172.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $493.3M | $173.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $482.6M | $172.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $499.5M | $171.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $491.2M | $214.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $483.7M | $231.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.1M | $244.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-771.0K | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.8M | $-3.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.9% | -4.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.8M | $180.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-771.0K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0K | $344.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-125.0K | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $663.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-974.0K | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $267.0K |
| Q4 25 | -2.9% | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.2% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | -8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTKB
| Products | $46.6M | 75% |
| Services | $15.5M | 25% |
TDUP
Segment breakdown not available.
