vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cytek Biosciences, Inc. (CTKB) and Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Veris Residential, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($70.1M vs $62.1M, roughly 1.1× Cytek Biosciences, Inc.). Veris Residential, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -20.0% vs -70.9%, a 50.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cytek Biosciences, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 3.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Cytek Biosciences, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.7% CAGR vs 1.9%).
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-performance flow cytometry systems, associated reagents and analysis software. Its solutions serve life science research, clinical diagnostics and biopharmaceutical sectors, with a global customer base across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
Veris Residential, Inc. is an American real estate investment trust headquartered in Jersey City, New Jersey, investing primarily in apartments in New Jersey and Boston.
CTKB vs VRE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.1M | $70.1M |
| Net Profit | $-44.1M | $-14.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.9% | 95.9% |
| Operating Margin | -9.0% | -22.2% |
| Net Margin | -70.9% | -20.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 3.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -557.1% | -30.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $62.1M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | $73.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.6M | $75.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.5M | $67.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.5M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.5M | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.6M | $67.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-14.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-44.1M | $-203.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $75.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.6M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.6M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $941.0K | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.4M | $2.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 95.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.9% | 97.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.7% | 96.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.3% | 97.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.6% | 95.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.5% | 97.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.3% | 96.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.6% | 97.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -9.0% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.3% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.1% | -20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.2% | -16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.3% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | -20.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -70.9% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.5% | 102.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.2% | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.5% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.8% | -18.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | -14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.4% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $90.9M | $9.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $341.7M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $461.5M | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $90.9M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.3M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.5M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.3M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.7M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.9M | $18.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $341.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $378.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $377.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $379.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $385.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $389.1M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $461.5M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $494.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $493.3M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $482.6M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $499.5M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $491.2M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $483.7M | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-771.0K | $14.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-771.0K | $76.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.9M | $13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.0K | $23.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-125.0K | $13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $52.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $10.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-974.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTKB
| Products | $46.6M | 75% |
| Services | $15.5M | 25% |
VRE
Segment breakdown not available.