vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CANTALOUPE, INC. (CTLP) and DIEBOLD NIXDORF, Inc (DBD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cantaloupe, Inc., previously known as USA Technologies Inc., is an American company known for its work with ePort cashless acceptance technology running on its patented ePort Connect service, a PCI compliant services. ePort Connect wirelessly facilitates electronic payment options to consumers with credit, debit, or NFC enabled electronic wallets like Apple Pay and Google Pay while providing operators with both telemetry and machine-to-machine (M2M) services. ePort technology is primarily fou...
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated is an American multinational financial and retail technology company based in North Canton, Ohio. It specializes in the sale, manufacture, installation, and service of self-service transaction systems, point-of-sale terminals, physical security products, and software and related services for global financial, retail, and commercial markets. Diebold Nixdorf has a presence in around 130 countries, and the company employs approximately 23,000 people.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $78.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-70.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-919.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
