vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CANTALOUPE, INC. (CTLP) and Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Krystal Biotech, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($107.1M vs $78.7M, roughly 1.4× CANTALOUPE, INC.). Krystal Biotech, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 48.0% vs -0.1%, a 48.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Krystal Biotech, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.5% vs 6.8%). Krystal Biotech, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($75.4M vs $-614.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Krystal Biotech, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (53.8% CAGR vs 7.7%).
Cantaloupe, Inc., previously known as USA Technologies Inc., is an American company known for its work with ePort cashless acceptance technology running on its patented ePort Connect service, a PCI compliant services. ePort Connect wirelessly facilitates electronic payment options to consumers with credit, debit, or NFC enabled electronic wallets like Apple Pay and Google Pay while providing operators with both telemetry and machine-to-machine (M2M) services. ePort technology is primarily fou...
Krystal Biotech, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in the research, development and commercialization of novel gene therapies for rare, serious dermatological diseases with high unmet medical needs. It primarily serves patients across North America and Europe, focusing on monogenic skin disorders that lack effective standard treatment options.
CTLP vs KRYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $78.7M | $107.1M |
| Net Profit | $-70.0K | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.0% | 41.5% |
| Net Margin | -0.1% | 48.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.8% | 17.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -101.4% | 13.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $78.7M | $107.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.9M | $97.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.6M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.4M | $88.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.7M | $91.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.8M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.7M | $70.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.9M | $45.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-70.0K | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-919.0K | $79.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.2M | $35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0M | $45.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7M | $932.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.1% | 41.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 45.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | -14.8% |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 48.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | 81.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.2% | 40.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | 49.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.9% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $2.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.65 | $1.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $1.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $0.91 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $53.0M | $496.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $37.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $252.5M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $381.9M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.15× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $53.0M | $496.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $392.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.1M | $353.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.3M | $308.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.7M | $344.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.1M | $374.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.9M | $345.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.2M | $359.0M |
| Q4 25 | $37.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $252.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $251.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $240.7M | $984.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.1M | $946.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.2M | $885.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.7M | $838.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $178.8M | $799.2M |
| Q4 25 | $381.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $389.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $381.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $312.1M | $982.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $335.6M | $917.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $319.9M | $853.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.1M | $77.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-614.0K | $75.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.8% | 70.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.8M | $188.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.1M | $77.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $39.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.4M | $52.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.4M | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.0K | $52.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.0M | $58.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.3M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.7M | $15.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-614.0K | $75.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | $50.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.6M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $52.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.8M | $57.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 70.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 52.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.1% | 57.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.3% | 69.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.9% | 32.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.38× | 1.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.10× | 1.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.36× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.47× | -0.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.16× | 17.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTLP
| Transaction Processing | $47.9M | 61% |
| Subscription Revenue | $21.8M | 28% |
| Products | $9.0M | 11% |
KRYS
Segment breakdown not available.
