vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CANTALOUPE, INC. (CTLP) and MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

CANTALOUPE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.7M vs $78.2M, roughly 1.0× MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.). MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.8% vs -0.1%, a 4.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CANTALOUPE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.8% vs 3.0%). MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.6M vs $-614.0K). Over the past eight quarters, CANTALOUPE, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.7% CAGR vs -8.9%).

Cantaloupe, Inc., previously known as USA Technologies Inc., is an American company known for its work with ePort cashless acceptance technology running on its patented ePort Connect service, a PCI compliant services. ePort Connect wirelessly facilitates electronic payment options to consumers with credit, debit, or NFC enabled electronic wallets like Apple Pay and Google Pay while providing operators with both telemetry and machine-to-machine (M2M) services. ePort technology is primarily fou...

The MasterCraft Boat Company is an American manufacturer of luxury high-performance boats. The company was founded in 1968 in Maryville, Tennessee, and is currently headquartered in Vonore, Tennessee. MasterCraft boats are used in waterskiing, wakeboarding and wake surfing.

CTLP vs MCFT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CTLP
CTLP
1.0× larger
CTLP
$78.7M
$78.2M
MCFT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CTLP
CTLP
+3.8% gap
CTLP
6.8%
3.0%
MCFT
Higher net margin
MCFT
MCFT
4.9% more per $
MCFT
4.8%
-0.1%
CTLP
More free cash flow
MCFT
MCFT
$8.3M more FCF
MCFT
$7.6M
$-614.0K
CTLP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CTLP
CTLP
Annualised
CTLP
7.7%
-8.9%
MCFT

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Revenue
$78.7M
$78.2M
Net Profit
$-70.0K
$3.7M
Gross Margin
25.0%
Operating Margin
2.0%
73.4%
Net Margin
-0.1%
4.8%
Revenue YoY
6.8%
3.0%
Net Profit YoY
-101.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.00
$0.45

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
$78.2M
Q4 25
$78.7M
$71.8M
Q3 25
$80.9M
$69.0M
Q2 25
$82.6M
$79.5M
Q1 25
$75.4M
$76.0M
Q4 24
$73.7M
$63.4M
Q3 24
$70.8M
$65.4M
Q2 24
$72.7M
$94.3M
Net Profit
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
$3.7M
Q4 25
$-70.0K
$2.5M
Q3 25
$-919.0K
$3.6M
Q2 25
$6.8M
$5.7M
Q1 25
$49.2M
$3.7M
Q4 24
$5.0M
$2.7M
Q3 24
$3.6M
$-5.1M
Q2 24
$2.2M
$6.2M
Gross Margin
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
25.0%
Q4 25
21.6%
Q3 25
22.3%
Q2 25
23.2%
Q1 25
20.8%
Q4 24
17.2%
Q3 24
18.1%
Q2 24
23.8%
Operating Margin
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
73.4%
Q4 25
2.0%
3.8%
Q3 25
2.0%
5.5%
Q2 25
6.3%
7.5%
Q1 25
9.1%
5.4%
Q4 24
8.4%
0.3%
Q3 24
5.8%
1.5%
Q2 24
4.9%
11.2%
Net Margin
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
4.8%
Q4 25
-0.1%
3.5%
Q3 25
-1.1%
5.3%
Q2 25
8.3%
7.2%
Q1 25
65.2%
4.9%
Q4 24
6.7%
4.3%
Q3 24
5.0%
-7.9%
Q2 24
3.0%
6.6%
EPS (diluted)
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
$0.45
Q4 25
$0.00
$0.16
Q3 25
$-0.02
$0.22
Q2 25
$0.10
$0.34
Q1 25
$0.65
$0.23
Q4 24
$0.07
$0.17
Q3 24
$0.04
$-0.31
Q2 24
$0.03
$0.38

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$53.0M
$84.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$37.7M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$252.5M
$189.3M
Total Assets
$381.9M
$277.9M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.15×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
$84.6M
Q4 25
$53.0M
$81.4M
Q3 25
$55.0M
$67.3M
Q2 25
$51.1M
$79.4M
Q1 25
$46.3M
$66.5M
Q4 24
$27.7M
$62.9M
Q3 24
$33.1M
$14.2M
Q2 24
$58.9M
$86.2M
Total Debt
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$37.7M
Q3 25
$38.3M
Q2 25
$38.7M
Q1 25
$39.2M
Q4 24
$37.0M
Q3 24
$37.3M
$49.5M
Q2 24
$37.5M
$49.3M
Stockholders' Equity
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
$189.3M
Q4 25
$252.5M
$189.1M
Q3 25
$251.8M
$185.5M
Q2 25
$251.0M
$183.4M
Q1 25
$240.7M
$182.1M
Q4 24
$190.1M
$178.3M
Q3 24
$186.2M
$175.4M
Q2 24
$181.7M
$183.7M
Total Assets
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
$277.9M
Q4 25
$381.9M
$259.7M
Q3 25
$389.5M
$259.3M
Q2 25
$381.9M
$259.9M
Q1 25
$370.5M
$261.9M
Q4 24
$303.0M
$250.1M
Q3 24
$312.1M
$309.1M
Q2 24
$335.6M
$259.9M
Debt / Equity
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.15×
Q3 25
0.15×
Q2 25
0.15×
Q1 25
0.16×
Q4 24
0.19×
Q3 24
0.20×
0.28×
Q2 24
0.21×
0.27×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$3.1M
$13.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-614.0K
$7.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-0.8%
9.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.58×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$25.8M
$29.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
$13.4M
Q4 25
$3.1M
$15.6M
Q3 25
$7.0M
$-6.8M
Q2 25
$9.4M
$20.4M
Q1 25
$22.4M
$6.3M
Q4 24
$522.0K
$6.4M
Q3 24
$-12.0M
$2.4M
Q2 24
$14.3M
Free Cash Flow
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
$7.6M
Q4 25
$-614.0K
$14.0M
Q3 25
$3.5M
$-9.9M
Q2 25
$4.3M
$17.9M
Q1 25
$18.6M
$4.3M
Q4 24
$-3.8M
$4.0M
Q3 24
$-15.8M
$199.0K
Q2 24
$8.5M
FCF Margin
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
9.8%
Q4 25
-0.8%
19.5%
Q3 25
4.4%
-14.4%
Q2 25
5.3%
22.5%
Q1 25
24.6%
5.7%
Q4 24
-5.1%
6.4%
Q3 24
-22.3%
0.3%
Q2 24
11.7%
Capex Intensity
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.8%
2.3%
Q3 25
4.2%
4.5%
Q2 25
6.2%
3.3%
Q1 25
5.1%
2.6%
Q4 24
5.8%
3.8%
Q3 24
5.4%
3.4%
Q2 24
7.9%
Cash Conversion
CTLP
CTLP
MCFT
MCFT
Q1 26
3.58×
Q4 25
6.17×
Q3 25
-1.88×
Q2 25
1.38×
3.59×
Q1 25
0.46×
1.69×
Q4 24
0.10×
2.34×
Q3 24
-3.36×
Q2 24
6.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CTLP
CTLP

Transaction Processing$47.9M61%
Subscription Revenue$21.8M28%
Products$9.0M11%

MCFT
MCFT

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons