vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX) and Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.7M vs $13.6M, roughly 1.4× Five Point Holdings, LLC). CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -0.8% vs -16.4%, a 15.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Five Point Holdings, LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -25.7%). Over the past eight quarters, CytomX Therapeutics, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-15.9% CAGR vs -48.5%).
CytomX Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in innovative cancer immunotherapies. It leverages its proprietary Probody technology platform to develop targeted therapies that activate exclusively in tumor microenvironments, minimizing off-target toxicities, with a pipeline covering multiple solid tumor indications and partnerships with leading global pharmaceutical firms.
Five Point Holdings, LLC is a leading U.S. real estate development company that focuses on planning and constructing large-scale master-planned mixed-use communities in high-demand markets across California. Its projects integrate residential housing, commercial office spaces, retail outlets, public amenities and recreational facilities to build vibrant, sustainable living and working environments for local populations.
CTMX vs FPH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.7M | $13.6M |
| Net Profit | $-154.0K | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -6.9% | -43.5% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -25.7% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 97.6% | -109.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $75.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.7M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.1M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.4M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.1M | $51.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $58.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-154.0K | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.5M | $23.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.9M | $121.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.5M | $14.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | -43.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 89.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.4% | 87.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 83.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.7% | 86.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | -16.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 77.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 156.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 44.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.2% | 177.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.6% | 75.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.0% | 28.8% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.0M | $332.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.9M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $175.1M | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $332.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $425.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $351.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.0M | $456.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.6M | $528.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.1M | $430.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.6M | $224.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.2M | $217.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-456.0K | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.5M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-31.2M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $175.1M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.5M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $120.5M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.2M | $2.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.8M | $-44.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-15.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -84.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-77.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-44.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.8M | $-71.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.0M | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.9M | $116.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.7M | $-18.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.5M | $-23.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $105.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.8M | $-71.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.2M | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-20.0M | $115.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.7M | $-18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.6M | $-23.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 138.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -84.6% | -959.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41.6% | 430.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.5% | 72.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -62.1% | -106.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -78.2% | -46.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -21.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.89× | 2.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.05× | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.61× | -3.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTMX
| Bristol Myers Squibb Company | $11.6M | 62% |
| Astellas Pharma Inc | $4.6M | 25% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc | $2.1M | 11% |
FPH
Segment breakdown not available.
