vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) and Evolus, Inc. (EOLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evolus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.1M vs $41.2M, roughly 1.8× CTO Realty Growth, Inc.). CTO Realty Growth, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.1% vs -14.6%, a 29.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 6.7%). Over the past eight quarters, CTO Realty Growth, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (19.5% CAGR vs 4.6%).
Keller Williams Realty is an American technology and international real estate franchise with headquarters in Austin, Texas. It is the largest real estate franchise in the United States by sales volume as of 2022.
Evolus, Inc. is a medical aesthetics company focused on developing and commercializing non-surgical cosmetic treatment solutions. Its flagship product is a prescription neuromodulator designed to reduce moderate to severe glabellar frown lines, serving licensed aesthetic healthcare providers and consumers across North America, Europe, and key Asia-Pacific regional markets.
CTO vs EOLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.2M | $73.1M |
| Net Profit | $6.2M | $-10.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.9% |
| Operating Margin | 175.0% | 23.8% |
| Net Margin | 15.1% | -14.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 174.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $41.2M | $73.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.3M | $90.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.8M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.6M | $69.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.8M | $68.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.7M | $78.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.8M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.8M | $66.9M |
| Q1 26 | $6.2M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.3M | $130.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.4M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.2M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $-11.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 66.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 75.0% | 65.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 75.4% | 66.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.0% | 65.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.2% | 68.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.4% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.4% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 71.1% | 70.3% |
| Q1 26 | 175.0% | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 75.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.6% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.7% | -14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.0% | -22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.4% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | -25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | -11.5% |
| Q1 26 | 15.1% | -14.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 73.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -22.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -62.2% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | -27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -42.6% | -8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | -31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | -17.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.13 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.81 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.77 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.69 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.3M | $49.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $156.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $575.4M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $220.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $8.3M | $49.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | $53.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3M | $43.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $61.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4M | $67.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $85.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8M | $93.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $156.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $616.3M | $146.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $604.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $602.2M | $121.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $519.0M | $121.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $526.8M | $121.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $482.7M | $120.9M |
| Q1 26 | $575.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $567.3M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $557.3M | $-28.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $574.1M | $-18.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $593.9M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.8M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $595.8M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.8M | $19.3M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | $220.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $225.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $219.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $228.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $213.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $232.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $229.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $233.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.85× | 22.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | 20.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.98× | 6.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTO
Segment breakdown not available.
EOLS
| Product revenue, net | $72.7M | 99% |
| Service revenue | $390.0K | 1% |