vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CITIUS ONCOLOGY, INC. (CTOR) and Motorsport Games Inc. (MSGM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

CITIUS ONCOLOGY, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9M vs $3.8M, roughly 1.0× Motorsport Games Inc.). Motorsport Games Inc. runs the higher net margin — 21.8% vs -140.3%, a 162.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Citius Oncology, Inc. is a late-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative targeted therapies for cancer patients. Its core pipeline covers treatments addressing unmet medical needs in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, primarily serving North American and global oncology care markets.

Motorsport Games Inc. is an American video game developer, publisher and esports event organizer based in Miramar, Florida. Motorsport Games is owned by Driven Lifestyle Group LLC.

CTOR vs MSGM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CTOR
CTOR
1.0× larger
CTOR
$3.9M
$3.8M
MSGM
Higher net margin
MSGM
MSGM
162.1% more per $
MSGM
21.8%
-140.3%
CTOR

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Revenue
$3.9M
$3.8M
Net Profit
$-5.5M
$839.3K
Gross Margin
80.0%
85.0%
Operating Margin
-133.2%
14.9%
Net Margin
-140.3%
21.8%
Revenue YoY
94.9%
Net Profit YoY
16.9%
131.8%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.06
$0.14

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Q4 25
$3.9M
$3.8M
Q3 25
$3.1M
Q2 25
$2.6M
Q1 25
$1.8M
Q4 24
$2.0M
Q3 24
$1.8M
Q2 24
$1.9M
Q1 24
$3.0M
Net Profit
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Q4 25
$-5.5M
$839.3K
Q3 25
$789.3K
Q2 25
$4.3M
Q1 25
$1.0M
Q4 24
$-2.6M
Q3 24
$-554.6K
Q2 24
$2.1M
Q1 24
$-1.7M
Gross Margin
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Q4 25
80.0%
85.0%
Q3 25
80.7%
Q2 25
82.4%
Q1 25
73.5%
Q4 24
45.8%
Q3 24
60.2%
Q2 24
59.0%
Q1 24
78.0%
Operating Margin
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Q4 25
-133.2%
14.9%
Q3 25
25.8%
Q2 25
75.9%
Q1 25
-5.3%
Q4 24
-33.5%
Q3 24
-107.2%
Q2 24
Q1 24
-40.1%
Net Margin
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Q4 25
-140.3%
21.8%
Q3 25
25.5%
Q2 25
164.3%
Q1 25
59.2%
Q4 24
-133.7%
Q3 24
-30.8%
Q2 24
111.9%
Q1 24
-55.0%
EPS (diluted)
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Q4 25
$-0.06
$0.14
Q3 25
$0.14
Q2 25
$0.82
Q1 25
$0.33
Q4 24
$-0.92
Q3 24
$-0.18
Q2 24
$0.77
Q1 24
$-0.61

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$7.3M
$5.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$58.4M
$6.8M
Total Assets
$110.0M
$12.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Q4 25
$7.3M
$5.0M
Q3 25
$4.1M
Q2 25
$2.4M
Q1 25
$1.1M
Q4 24
$859.3K
Q3 24
$1.1M
Q2 24
$300.0K
Q1 24
$500.0K
Stockholders' Equity
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Q4 25
$58.4M
$6.8M
Q3 25
$5.9M
Q2 25
$4.8M
Q1 25
$648.4K
Q4 24
$496.3K
Q3 24
$4.1M
Q2 24
$4.3M
Q1 24
$2.1M
Total Assets
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Q4 25
$110.0M
$12.0M
Q3 25
$10.1M
Q2 25
$8.2M
Q1 25
$6.1M
Q4 24
$6.3M
Q3 24
$7.0M
Q2 24
$7.2M
Q1 24
$9.8M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-7.4M
$1.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.07×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Q4 25
$-7.4M
$1.7M
Q3 25
$2.1M
Q2 25
$-30.5K
Q1 25
$305.2K
Q4 24
$-1.1M
Q3 24
$-680.3K
Q2 24
$-695.9K
Q1 24
$-373.7K
Capex Intensity
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
0.0%
Q2 24
Q1 24
Cash Conversion
CTOR
CTOR
MSGM
MSGM
Q4 25
2.07×
Q3 25
2.61×
Q2 25
-0.01×
Q1 25
0.29×
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
-0.33×
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons