vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Custom Truck One Source, Inc. (CTOS) and HANCOCK WHITNEY CORP (HWC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($422.2M vs $295.0M, roughly 1.4× HANCOCK WHITNEY CORP). HANCOCK WHITNEY CORP runs the higher net margin — 16.1% vs -4.2%, a 20.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Custom Truck One Source, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.5% vs -19.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.8% CAGR vs -9.4%).
Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is a leading provider of specialized heavy truck and equipment solutions in North America. It offers custom vehicle manufacturing, equipment sales and rentals, aftermarket parts, and maintenance services, serving core infrastructure, utility, construction, and energy industry segments.
Hancock Whitney Corp. is an American bank holding company headquartered in Gulfport, Mississippi. It operates 237 branches in Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas. The bank is the official bank of the New Orleans Saints and issues the official debit card. The bank is also the official bank of LSU Athletics and the Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns, being the exclusive provider of credit cards for the LSU Tigers, as well as debit cards for both athletic brands.
CTOS vs HWC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $422.2M | $295.0M |
| Net Profit | $-17.8M | $47.4M |
| Gross Margin | 20.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | — |
| Net Margin | -4.2% | 16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.5% | -19.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -333.7% | -60.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $422.2M | $295.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $387.3M | $389.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.9M | $385.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.2M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $307.1M | $364.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $398.3M | $364.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.5M | $367.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.6M | $359.6M |
| Q1 26 | $-17.8M | $47.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $127.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.4M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 41.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 38.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | 40.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 41.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 39.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 40.3% |
| Q1 26 | -4.2% | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.6% | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.2% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | $-0.08 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $1.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $1.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $1.38 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.11 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | $1.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.3M | $223.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $25.9M | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $809.1M | — |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $35.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $6.3M | $223.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $25.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $210.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $210.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $210.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $210.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $236.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $236.4M |
| Q1 26 | $809.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $809.1M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $784.7M | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $790.1M | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $813.4M | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $861.3M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $837.5M | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $856.7M | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | $35.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $35.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $35.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $35.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $34.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $35.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $35.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $35.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.03× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.10× | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.04× | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.87× | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.79× | 0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTOS
| Equipment sales | $273.9M | 65% |
| Rental revenue | $116.3M | 28% |
| Parts sales and services | $32.1M | 8% |
HWC
Segment breakdown not available.
