vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Custom Truck One Source, Inc. (CTOS) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $461.6M, roughly 1.2× Custom Truck One Source, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs -0.9%, a 28.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -12.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.0% CAGR vs 3.8%).

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is a leading provider of specialized heavy truck and equipment solutions in North America. It offers custom vehicle manufacturing, equipment sales and rentals, aftermarket parts, and maintenance services, serving core infrastructure, utility, construction, and energy industry segments.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

CTOS vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.2× larger
KIM
$542.5M
$461.6M
CTOS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+15.8% gap
KIM
3.2%
-12.6%
CTOS
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
28.8% more per $
KIM
27.9%
-0.9%
CTOS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CTOS
CTOS
Annualised
CTOS
20.0%
3.8%
KIM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$461.6M
$542.5M
Net Profit
$-4.1M
$151.2M
Gross Margin
22.3%
Operating Margin
6.8%
36.4%
Net Margin
-0.9%
27.9%
Revenue YoY
-12.6%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
76.9%
-9.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.02

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$461.6M
Q4 25
$387.3M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$359.9M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$392.2M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$307.1M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$398.3M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$337.5M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$320.6M
$500.2M
Net Profit
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$-4.1M
Q4 25
$20.9M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$-5.8M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$-28.4M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$-17.8M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$27.6M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$-17.4M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$-24.5M
$119.7M
Gross Margin
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
22.3%
Q4 25
31.8%
Q3 25
28.0%
Q2 25
26.1%
Q1 25
27.9%
Q4 24
29.7%
Q3 24
27.2%
Q2 24
27.8%
Operating Margin
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
6.8%
Q4 25
13.4%
36.4%
Q3 25
9.1%
34.9%
Q2 25
7.1%
39.2%
Q1 25
4.0%
33.6%
Q4 24
16.9%
31.7%
Q3 24
6.8%
33.7%
Q2 24
5.5%
32.1%
Net Margin
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
-0.9%
Q4 25
5.4%
27.9%
Q3 25
-1.6%
25.7%
Q2 25
-7.2%
31.0%
Q1 25
-5.8%
24.8%
Q4 24
6.9%
31.6%
Q3 24
-5.2%
26.8%
Q2 24
-7.6%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$-0.02
Q4 25
$0.10
Q3 25
$-0.03
Q2 25
$-0.13
Q1 25
$-0.08
Q4 24
$0.11
Q3 24
$-0.07
Q2 24
$-0.10

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$9.6M
$211.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.1M
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$805.2M
$10.4B
Total Assets
$3.5B
$19.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.01×
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$9.6M
Q4 25
$6.3M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$13.1M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$5.3M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$5.4M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$3.8M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$8.4M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$8.1M
$126.4M
Total Debt
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$5.1M
Q4 25
$1.6B
$7.7B
Q3 25
$1.6B
Q2 25
$1.6B
Q1 25
$1.6B
Q4 24
$1.5B
$8.0B
Q3 24
$1.6B
Q2 24
$1.5B
Stockholders' Equity
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$805.2M
Q4 25
$809.1M
$10.4B
Q3 25
$784.7M
$10.5B
Q2 25
$790.1M
$10.5B
Q1 25
$813.4M
$10.6B
Q4 24
$861.3M
$10.7B
Q3 24
$837.5M
$10.5B
Q2 24
$856.7M
$10.6B
Total Assets
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$3.5B
Q4 25
$3.4B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$3.6B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$3.5B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$3.5B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$3.5B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
0.01×
Q4 25
2.03×
0.74×
Q3 25
2.10×
Q2 25
2.04×
Q1 25
1.97×
Q4 24
1.77×
0.75×
Q3 24
1.87×
Q2 24
1.79×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$47.3M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$81.5M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$125.7M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$55.6M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$82.1M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$16.5M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$37.8M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
$205.4M
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
FCF Margin
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
38.3%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Capex Intensity
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
0.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Cash Conversion
CTOS
CTOS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.27×
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
2.98×
1.44×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CTOS
CTOS

Equipment sales$292.6M63%
Rental revenue$137.2M30%
Parts sales and services$31.8M7%

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons