vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Custom Truck One Source, Inc. (CTOS) and Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (PGY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($422.2M vs $321.0M, roughly 1.3× Pagaya Technologies Ltd.). Pagaya Technologies Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs -4.2%, a 14.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Pagaya Technologies Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.5% vs -8.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (16.4% CAGR vs 14.8%).
Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is a leading provider of specialized heavy truck and equipment solutions in North America. It offers custom vehicle manufacturing, equipment sales and rentals, aftermarket parts, and maintenance services, serving core infrastructure, utility, construction, and energy industry segments.
Pagaya Technologies is an Israeli-American financial technology company based in New York City. The company evaluates loan applications using artificial intelligence (AI) with the aim of modernizing credit checks. The company has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since 2022. According to its own figures, Pagaya had assessed loan applications with a volume of around US$2.6 trillion and brokered a cumulative loan volume of around US$28 billion by 2024. Its customers are mainly banks an...
CTOS vs PGY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $422.2M | $321.0M |
| Net Profit | $-17.8M | $34.3M |
| Gross Margin | 20.3% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | -4.2% | 10.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.5% | 16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -333.7% | 114.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $422.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $387.3M | $321.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.9M | $339.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.2M | $317.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $307.1M | $282.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $398.3M | $275.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.5M | $249.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.6M | $242.6M |
| Q1 26 | $-17.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.9M | $34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.8M | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.4M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.6M | $-237.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.4M | $-67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.5M | $-74.8M |
| Q1 26 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.8% | 40.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.0% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.1% | 39.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | 40.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.2% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | 40.0% |
| Q1 26 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | 16.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | -86.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.2% | -27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.6% | -30.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.11 | $-3.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | $-1.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.3M | $235.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $25.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $809.1M | $480.0M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3M | $235.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1M | $218.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $183.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $186.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $187.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $147.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $233.6M |
| Q1 26 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $317.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $230.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $232.6M |
| Q1 26 | $809.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $809.1M | $480.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $784.7M | $438.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $790.1M | $366.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $813.4M | $335.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $861.3M | $326.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $837.5M | $462.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $856.7M | $526.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | 0.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.87× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.79× | 0.44× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $79.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $76.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 23.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $224.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.3M | $79.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.5M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.7M | $57.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.6M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.1M | $27.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.5M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.8M | $9.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $76.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $53.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.27× | 2.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTOS
| Equipment sales | $273.9M | 65% |
| Rental revenue | $116.3M | 28% |
| Parts sales and services | $32.1M | 8% |
PGY
| Network AI Fees | $287.4M | 90% |
| Financial Service | $33.6M | 10% |
