vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Centuri Holdings, Inc. (CTRI) and STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC. (STWD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Centuri Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($858.6M vs $492.9M, roughly 1.7× STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC.). STARWOOD PROPERTY TRUST, INC. runs the higher net margin — 19.7% vs 3.5%, a 16.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Centuri Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.7% vs 8.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Centuri Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.5% CAGR vs -2.9%).
Centuri, formerly known as Allied Leisure, was an American arcade game manufacturer. They were based in Hialeah, Florida, and were one of the top six suppliers of coin-operated arcade video game machinery in the United States during the early 1980s. Centuri in its modern inception was formed when former Taito America president Ed Miller and his partner Bill Olliges took over Allied Leisure, Inc. They renamed it "Centuri" in 1980. The company's vice president was Joel Hochberg from about 1976 ...
Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc. was one of the largest companies that owned, operated, franchised and managed hotels, resorts, spas, residences, and vacation ownership properties. Starwood was founded in 1969 as a real estate investment trust named Hotel Investors Trust. In 1995, it was acquired and reorganized by Barry Sternlicht, who was its chairman until 2005 and founder of the Starwood Capital Group. Starwood had 11 brands and owned, managed, or franchised 1,297 properties co...
CTRI vs STWD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $858.6M | $492.9M |
| Net Profit | $30.4M | $96.9M |
| Gross Margin | 9.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 26.6% |
| Net Margin | 3.5% | 19.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.7% | 8.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 194.1% | 87.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $858.6M | $492.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $850.0M | $488.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.1M | $444.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $550.1M | $418.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $717.1M | $454.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $720.1M | $479.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $672.1M | $489.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $528.0M | $523.1M |
| Q4 25 | $30.4M | $96.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $129.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.9M | $112.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3M | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $76.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7M | $77.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-25.1M | $154.3M |
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 30.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | 28.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.2% | 30.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.3% | 26.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.5% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.7% | 29.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.34 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.35 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $126.6M | $499.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $873.0M | $6.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $63.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $126.6M | $499.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.1M | $301.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.3M | $259.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3M | $440.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.0M | $377.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.5M | $357.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $259.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.4M | $327.4M |
| Q4 25 | $873.0M | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $585.2M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $567.1M | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.5M | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.6M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $527.3M | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $530.4M | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $197.8M | $6.3B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $63.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $62.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $62.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $62.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $62.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $64.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $64.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $66.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $83.9M | $488.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.76× | 5.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $83.9M | $488.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2M | $337.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.7M | $-87.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.7M | $238.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.0M | $295.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.2M | $241.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-56.6M | $53.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.5M | $55.9M |
| Q4 25 | $66.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-48.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $160.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-76.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.76× | 5.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.48× | 4.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.43× | -0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.90× | 5.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.84× | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTRI
| Master Services Agreement | $660.7M | 77% |
| Non Union Electric Segment | $163.4M | 19% |
| Related Party | $25.6M | 3% |
STWD
| Commercial And Residential Lending Segment | $335.2M | 68% |
| Infrastructure Lending Segment | $70.3M | 14% |
| Property Segment | $57.8M | 12% |
| Other | $29.7M | 6% |
