vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cytosorbents Corp (CTSO) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cytosorbents Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.2M vs $6.3M, roughly 1.5× High Roller Technologies, Inc.). High Roller Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 58.4% vs -59.5%, a 117.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cytosorbents Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.9% vs -16.4%). High Roller Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-90.0K vs $-4.9M).
CytoSorbents Corporation is a publicly traded company located in Princeton, New Jersey.
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
CTSO vs ROLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.2M | $6.3M |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | $3.7M |
| Gross Margin | 73.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | -59.5% | 58.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.9% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.4% | 831.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $-592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.8M | $-501.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 73.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -37.6% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.5% | -47.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -37.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -56.1% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -40.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -51.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -59.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -33.4% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.9% | -48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.1% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -48.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -67.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.2M | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9M | $6.6M |
| Total Assets | $44.2M | $16.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.6M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.6M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.5M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.4M | $-779.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $44.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.8M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.8M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.23× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.8M | $-78.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.9M | $-90.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -53.4% | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $-78.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $-90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-845.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | -53.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.3% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.1% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.7% | -53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -54.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.78× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTSO
| Direct | $5.1M | 55% |
| Distributors And Strategic Partners | $4.2M | 45% |
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |