vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Corteva (CTVA) and Packaging Corporation of America (PKG), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Corteva is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9B vs $2.4B, roughly 1.7× Packaging Corporation of America). Packaging Corporation of America runs the higher net margin — -14.1% vs 4.3%, a 18.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Packaging Corporation of America posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -1.7%). Corteva produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.2B vs $127.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Packaging Corporation of America's revenue compounded faster (9.3% CAGR vs -6.7%).
Corteva, Inc. is an American company devoted to products for seeds and crop protection, including herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and biologicals that are sold in 110 countries. The company's name combines "cor" with "teva". It is headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana. Corteva sells a large portion of their seeds under the Pioneer Hi-Bred International brand.
Packaging Corporation of America is an American manufacturing company based in Lake Forest, Illinois. The company has about 15,500 employees, with operations primarily in the United States. The CEO is Mark W. Kowlzan.
CTVA vs PKG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9B | $2.4B |
| Net Profit | $-552.0M | $101.9M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 18.9% |
| Operating Margin | -13.6% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | -14.1% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.7% | 10.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1246.3% | -53.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.80 | $1.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $-552.0M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-320.0M | $226.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $241.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $652.0M | $203.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.0M | $221.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-524.0M | $238.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $198.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $419.0M | $146.9M |
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | 18.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.6% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.3% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.7% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.2% | 18.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.6% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.1% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.9% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.7% | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.2% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 9.9% |
| Q4 25 | -14.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.5% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.80 | $1.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $2.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.92 | $2.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.95 | $2.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $2.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.76 | $2.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.51 | $2.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.60 | $1.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.5B | $529.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7B | $4.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.1B | $4.6B |
| Total Assets | $42.8B | $10.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.07× | 0.87× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $529.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $634.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $787.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $751.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $685.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $676.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $613.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $692.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $24.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3B | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.8B | $4.0B |
| Q4 25 | $42.8B | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.2B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.8B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.1B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.8B | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.9B | $8.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.5B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.6B | $8.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.07× | 0.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.07× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.08× | 0.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.10× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.4B | $446.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.2B | $127.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 106.2% | 5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 5.7% | 13.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | 4.38× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.8B | $728.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $446.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $193.0M | $472.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $947.0M | $299.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1B | $339.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $325.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.0M | $327.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $451.0M | $278.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.6B | $260.4M |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $127.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.0M | $280.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $829.0M | $129.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2B | $191.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $124.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.0M | $180.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.0M | $33.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.8B | $183.7M |
| Q4 25 | 106.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -49.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 100.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -61.4% | 9.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.23× | 1.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.43× | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.23× | 1.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CTVA
| Corn | $1.4B | 35% |
| Herbicides | $1.1B | 27% |
| Insecticides | $488.0M | 12% |
| Fungicides | $272.0M | 7% |
| Biologicals | $191.0M | 5% |
| Soybean | $164.0M | 4% |
| Other | $160.0M | 4% |
| Otheroilseeds | $94.0M | 2% |
PKG
| Packaging | $2.2B | 93% |
| Paper | $154.2M | 7% |
| Intersegment | $37.1M | 2% |
