vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CuriosityStream Inc. (CURI) and Tectonic Financial, Inc. (TECTP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tectonic Financial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.0M vs $19.2M, roughly 1.2× CuriosityStream Inc.). Tectonic Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.8% vs -19.7%, a 43.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CuriosityStream Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.8% vs 17.9%). CuriosityStream Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.9M vs $-17.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Tectonic Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (270.5% CAGR vs 26.5%).
Curiosity Stream Inc., formerly branded as CuriosityStream, is an American media company and over-the-top subscription video streaming service which offers documentary programming including films, series, and TV shows. The company offers a video on demand subscription service branded as "Curiosity Stream" and a linear broadcast television channel known as the Curiosity Channel through various services including FuboTV and The Roku Channel.
Tectonic Financial, Inc.TECTPEarnings & Financial Report
Tectonic Financial, Inc. is a US-based diversified financial services provider. It offers core services including wealth management, investment banking, capital markets advisory, and tailored financial solutions. Its key client segments cover high-net-worth individuals, institutional investors, and small to mid-sized enterprises across North America.
CURI vs TECTP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.2M | $23.0M |
| Net Profit | $-3.8M | $5.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -17.6% | 30.6% |
| Net Margin | -19.7% | 23.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 35.8% | 17.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -34.6% | 15.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.4M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.0M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $784.0K | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.0K | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.0M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | -17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 26.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.4% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -25.8% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.6% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.4% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | -19.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.4% | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.9% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.3% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.4% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -42.0% | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $41.5M | $119.2M |
| Total Assets | $75.7M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $41.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.8M | $114.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.1M | $111.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $113.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.2M | $112.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.8M | $110.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.0M | $108.5M |
| Q4 25 | $75.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | $997.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.3M | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.2M | $863.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.6M | $847.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.9M | $777.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.6M | $777.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.0M | $-17.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.9M | $-17.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 20.5% | -74.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -3.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $-32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $-86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $666.0K | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-86.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.3M |
| Q4 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -74.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | -163.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -406.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -115.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -165.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | -7.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.03× | -8.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -28.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
