vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Currenc Group Inc. (CURR) and Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.4M vs $10.1M, roughly 1.2× Currenc Group Inc.). Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -5.5% vs -46.5%, a 41.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18033.4% vs -23.3%).
CURR vs PAVS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.1M | $12.4M |
| Net Profit | $-4.7M | $-681.0K |
| Gross Margin | 31.8% | 20.0% |
| Operating Margin | -43.0% | -5.1% |
| Net Margin | -46.5% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.3% | 18033.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -54.0% | 61.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $12.7M | $0 |
| Q3 25 | — | $-681.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-3.8M | $8.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 32.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -141.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -18.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -44.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.2% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -30.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $62.3M | $5.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-68.4M | $23.6M |
| Total Assets | $110.8M | $37.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-68.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-47.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.9M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-10.2M | $10.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.5M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $82.0M | $11.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.5M | $-159.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-159.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-221.0K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-10.5M | $-13.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-233.0K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CURR
| Sales Of Airtime | $5.5M | 54% |
| Fiat Remittance Service | $4.4M | 44% |
PAVS
Segment breakdown not available.