vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CURTISS WRIGHT CORP (CW) and EMBRAER S.A. (EMBJ), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
The Curtiss-Wright Corporation is an American manufacturer and services provider headquartered in Davidson, North Carolina, with factories and operations in and outside the United States. Created in 1929 from the consolidation of Curtiss, Wright, and various supplier companies, the company was immediately the country's largest aviation firm and built more than 142,000 aircraft engines for the U.S. military during World War II.
Embraer S.A. is a Brazilian multinational aerospace corporation. It develops and manufactures aircraft and aviation systems, and provides leasing, equipment, and technical support services. Embraer is the third largest producer of civil aircraft worldwide after Boeing and Airbus. The company also has a significant presence in military aviation, ranking among the top 100 defense contractors. It is headquartered in São José dos Campos, São Paulo, with offices and operations in China, the Nether...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $947.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $869.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $876.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $805.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $824.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $798.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $784.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $111.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.69 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.31 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.19 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.68 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.89 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.58 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.99 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
