vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. (CWK) and Principal Financial Group (PFG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $750.8M, roughly 3.9× Principal Financial Group). Principal Financial Group runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -0.8%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.8% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs -58.3%).
Cushman & Wakefield Inc. is an American global commercial real estate and property management services firm. The company's corporate headquarters is located in Chicago, Illinois. It is named after co-founders J. Clydesdale Cushman and Bernard Wakefield.
Principal Financial GroupPFGEarnings & Financial Report
Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) is an American global financial investment management and insurance company headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, United States.
CWK vs PFG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $750.8M |
| Net Profit | $-22.4M | $1.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.8% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -119.8% | 783.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $750.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $4.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-22.4M | $517.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.4M | $213.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.3M | $406.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.9M | $905.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.7M | $-220.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | $353.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $2.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $1.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $3.92 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | $-0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $1.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $784.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | — |
| Total Assets | $7.7B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $784.2M | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $634.4M | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.2M | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $623.2M | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $793.3M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $775.4M | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $567.3M | $4.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $11.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $11.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $11.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $11.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | $341.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $334.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $323.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $313.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $313.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $322.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $308.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.45× | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.57× | 0.34× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.70× | 0.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.73× | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.81× | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.91× | 0.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $257.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $234.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $293.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $257.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $235.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $811.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-162.0M | $977.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.8M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $234.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $300.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-166.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.58× | 4.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | 2.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | -85.26× | 20.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.82× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.61× | 4.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CWK
| Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Or Group Of Investees | $1.8B | 61% |
| Other | $1.1B | 39% |
PFG
Segment breakdown not available.