vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $18.1M, roughly 1.5× Crexendo, Inc.). Crexendo, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.7% vs -112.0%, a 118.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs 11.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Crexendo, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.4% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Crexendo, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered cloud communications technology provider. It delivers unified communications as a service (UCaaS), contact center solutions, business VoIP services, and collaborative work tools, primarily catering to small and medium-sized enterprises operating in the North American market.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
CXDO vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.1M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.2M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.7% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.2% | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 140.2% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.1M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.5M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.2M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.3M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $507.0K | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.0K | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $588.0K | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $434.0K | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.4% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | -151.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -190.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-37.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $3.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $114.0K | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $63.8M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $77.7M | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | $114.0K | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0K | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $356.0K | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.0K | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0K | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $709.0K | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $823.0K | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $937.0K | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $63.8M | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.3M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.3M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.2M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.2M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.8M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | $77.7M | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.4M | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.4M | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.9M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.3M | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.6M | $270.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.5M | $299.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | 4.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.02× | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.3M | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.93× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-166.0K | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.93× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.51× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.38× | -2.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CXDO
| Services | $8.6M | 48% |
| Software Solution Segment | $8.3M | 46% |
| Products | $1.1M | 6% |
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
