vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) and Outdoor Holding Co (POWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Crexendo, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.1M vs $13.4M, roughly 1.3× Outdoor Holding Co). Outdoor Holding Co runs the higher net margin — 16.7% vs 6.7%, a 9.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Crexendo, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.2% vs -54.1%).
Crexendo, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered cloud communications technology provider. It delivers unified communications as a service (UCaaS), contact center solutions, business VoIP services, and collaborative work tools, primarily catering to small and medium-sized enterprises operating in the North American market.
Vista Outdoor Inc. was an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer that operated in two segments: shooting sports and outdoor products. It was a "house of brands" with more than 40 labels and subsidiaries.
CXDO vs POWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.1M | $13.4M |
| Net Profit | $1.2M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 14.7% |
| Net Margin | 6.7% | 16.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.2% | -54.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 140.2% | 108.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.5M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $12.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.2M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.3M | $-50.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-77.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $507.0K | $-26.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.0K | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $588.0K | $-14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $434.0K | $-5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 87.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 87.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 86.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 85.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | -50.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | -213.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | -163.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -50.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | -50.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | -54.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | -614.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -103.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -120.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $69.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $114.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $63.8M | $237.3M |
| Total Assets | $77.7M | $271.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $69.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $65.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.6M |
| Q4 25 | $114.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $356.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $709.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $823.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $937.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $63.8M | $237.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.3M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.3M | $222.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.2M | $222.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $299.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $325.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.2M | $342.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.8M | $358.0M |
| Q4 25 | $77.7M | $271.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $270.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.4M | $269.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.4M | $297.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.9M | $355.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.3M | $368.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.6M | $398.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.5M | $403.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.02× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.3M | $5.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $5.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 37.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.93× | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-2.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $-547.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-166.0K | $4.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $720.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -63.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -88.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | -5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.93× | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.05× | 2.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.51× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.38× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CXDO
| Services | $8.6M | 48% |
| Software Solution Segment | $8.3M | 46% |
| Products | $1.1M | 6% |
POWW
Segment breakdown not available.