vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) and SYPRIS SOLUTIONS INC (SYPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SYPRIS SOLUTIONS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.3M vs $18.1M, roughly 1.7× Crexendo, Inc.). Crexendo, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.7% vs -12.9%, a 19.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Crexendo, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.2% vs -9.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Crexendo, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.4% CAGR vs -7.7%).
Crexendo, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered cloud communications technology provider. It delivers unified communications as a service (UCaaS), contact center solutions, business VoIP services, and collaborative work tools, primarily catering to small and medium-sized enterprises operating in the North American market.
Sypris Solutions Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered provider of highly engineered components and specialized technical services, primarily serving aerospace, defense, automotive and commercial industrial markets. It delivers custom manufacturing, performance testing, and value-added engineering support for mission-critical systems and parts for global enterprise clients.
CXDO vs SYPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.1M | $30.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.2M | $-3.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 4.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | -10.9% |
| Net Margin | 6.7% | -12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.2% | -9.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 140.2% | -2992.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.17 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.1M | $30.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.5M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $29.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.2M | $33.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.3M | $35.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $517.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-899.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $507.0K | $135.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.0K | $390.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $588.0K | $16.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $434.0K | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | -6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | -12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | -6.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $114.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $63.8M | $17.8M |
| Total Assets | $77.7M | $107.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $114.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $356.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $709.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $823.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $937.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $63.8M | $17.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.3M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.3M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.2M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.2M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.8M | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | $77.7M | $107.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $112.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.4M | $105.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.4M | $110.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.9M | $119.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.3M | $121.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.6M | $124.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.5M | $129.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.02× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.3M | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.93× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-6.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | $-178.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-166.0K | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-390.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $941.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.93× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.05× | -0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.29× | 17.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.95× | -12.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.51× | 385.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.38× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CXDO
| Services | $8.6M | 48% |
| Software Solution Segment | $8.3M | 46% |
| Products | $1.1M | 6% |
SYPR
| Sypris Electronics | $17.7M | 59% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $12.5M | 41% |
