vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and ROYAL GOLD INC (RGLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROYAL GOLD INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($375.3M vs $219.1M, roughly 1.7× Sprinklr, Inc.). ROYAL GOLD INC runs the higher net margin — 24.9% vs 1.3%, a 23.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROYAL GOLD INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (85.3% vs 9.2%). Over the past eight quarters, ROYAL GOLD INC's revenue compounded faster (58.8% CAGR vs 6.2%).
Sprinklr is an American software company that develops a software as a service (SaaS) customer experience management (CXM) platform. The company's software, also called Sprinklr, combines different applications for social media marketing, social advertising, content management, collaboration, employee advocacy, customer care, social media research, and social media monitoring.
Royal Gold Inc. is a leading precious metals streaming and royalty firm that acquires and manages a diversified portfolio of streaming interests, royalties, and equity interests tied to mining projects. Its assets cover gold, silver, and copper production across North America, South America, Africa, and Australia, operating with a low-risk model that avoids direct mining operations.
CXM vs RGLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $219.1M | $375.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.9M | $93.6M |
| Gross Margin | 66.4% | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 56.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.3% | 24.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.2% | 85.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -72.2% | -12.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $219.1M | $375.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.0M | $252.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.5M | $209.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.5M | $193.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.7M | $202.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.2M | $193.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.0M | $174.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $194.2M | $148.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6M | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $132.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.7M | $113.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.5M | $107.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $96.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6M | $81.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.1M | $47.2M |
| Q4 25 | 66.4% | 64.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.2% | 73.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.5% | 72.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.0% | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.2% | 70.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.6% | 66.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.9% | 64.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 75.5% | 58.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 56.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 64.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 67.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 63.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 65.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.0% | 61.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 58.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 50.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 63.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.7% | 58.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 53.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 49.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 46.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.9% | 31.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $1.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $2.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.35 | $1.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $1.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $1.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $0.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $189.6M | $233.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $558.1M | $7.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $9.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $189.6M | $233.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.4M | $172.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.4M | $248.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.3M | $240.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.2M | $195.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.1M | $127.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $164.0M | $137.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $558.1M | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $543.4M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $639.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $612.1M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $497.0M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $469.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $610.9M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $679.7M | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $9.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $970.3M | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $983.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $241.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $19.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.87× | 2.58× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $142.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | $241.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.8M | $174.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.8M | $152.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $136.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2M | $141.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.3M | $136.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.7M | $113.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3M | $138.3M |
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.87× | 2.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.76× | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | 1.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.88× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.58× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.92× | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.82× | 2.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CXM
| License And Service | $190.3M | 87% |
| Professional Services | $28.8M | 13% |
RGLD
| Gold | $216.9M | 58% |
| Pueblo Viejo | $47.3M | 13% |
| Andacollo | $32.6M | 9% |
| Silver | $32.1M | 9% |
| Other | $27.2M | 7% |
| Copper | $13.7M | 4% |
| Cortez Legacy Zone | $5.4M | 1% |
