vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORP (CZNC) and STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC. (LAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($36.9M vs $19.6M, roughly 1.9× STANDARD BIOTOOLS INC.). CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORP runs the higher net margin — 12.1% vs -177.4%, a 189.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.6% vs -11.5%). CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.1M vs $-23.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORP's revenue compounded faster (19.7% CAGR vs -12.2%).
Northern Trust Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, that caters to corporations, institutional investors, and ultra high net worth individuals. Northern Trust is one of the largest banking institutions in the United States and one of the oldest banks in continuous operation. As of December 31, 2025, it had $1.8 trillion in assets under management and $14.9 trillion in assets under custody. Northern Trust Corporation is incorporated in Delaw...
Standard BioTools Inc., previously known as Fluidigm Corp., is an American life science tools company that offers analytical mass cytometry systems for flow cytometry and tissue imaging, along with associated assays and reagents, as well as an automated genomic analysis instrument and a variety of microfluidic arrays, or integrated fluidic circuits (IFCs), and consumables with fully kitted reagents. Custom assays and services are available with all systems and applications.
CZNC vs LAB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $36.9M | $19.6M |
| Net Profit | $4.5M | $-34.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | -168.5% |
| Net Margin | 12.1% | -177.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.6% | -11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -45.4% | -28.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $36.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.6M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.3M | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0M | $40.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.3M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.7M | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6M | $-34.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | $-33.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $-26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $-26.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $-45.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $-32.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 53.1% |
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -168.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.7% | -118.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | -80.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.6% | -120.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.4% | -134.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.1% | -132.2% |
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | -177.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | -153.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.3% | -63.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | -122.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | -203.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.6% | -70.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.40 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.41 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.40 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.35 | $-0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $46.1M | $129.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $341.7M | $399.7M |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $539.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $46.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.1M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.6M | $158.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.7M | $150.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.2M | $210.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $269.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.4M | $287.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.0M |
| Q4 25 | $341.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.0M | $399.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $286.4M | $424.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $281.8M | $454.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.3M | $489.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.2M | $510.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $261.7M | $577.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $539.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $557.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $579.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $681.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $708.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $777.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.10× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $32.0M | $-22.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.1M | $-23.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 81.6% | -118.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 4.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.17× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $50.1M | $-111.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $32.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $-22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5M | $-20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-30.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6M | $-27.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.6M | $-39.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7M | $-62.5M |
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $-35.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $-41.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $-63.3M |
| Q4 25 | 81.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.9% | -118.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | -103.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -86.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 111.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.6% | -136.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.2% | -182.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.4% | -138.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 7.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.08× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CZNC
Segment breakdown not available.
LAB
| Consumables | $8.7M | 45% |
| Services And Other Revenue | $5.8M | 29% |
| Instruments | $5.1M | 26% |
