vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DAKTRONICS INC (DAKT) and Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tenable Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($262.1M vs $229.3M, roughly 1.1× DAKTRONICS INC). DAKTRONICS INC runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs 0.5%, a 7.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DAKTRONICS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.0% vs 9.6%). Tenable Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($82.6M vs $14.0M). Over the past eight quarters, DAKTRONICS INC's revenue compounded faster (16.0% CAGR vs 8.8%).
Daktronics, Inc. is an American company based in Brookings, South Dakota, that designs, manufactures, sells, and services video displays, scoreboards, digital billboards, dynamic message signs, sound systems, and related products. It was founded in 1968 by two South Dakota State University professors.
Tenable Holdings, Inc. is a cybersecurity company based in Columbia, Maryland. Its vulnerability scanner software Nessus, developed in 1998, is one of the most widely deployed vulnerability assessment solutions in the cybersecurity industry. As of December 31, 2023, the company had approximately 44,000 customers, including 65% of the Fortune 500.
DAKT vs TENB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $229.3M | $262.1M |
| Net Profit | $17.5M | $1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 27.0% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | 25.0% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.0% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $262.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $229.3M | $260.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $219.0M | $252.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.6M | $247.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $149.5M | $239.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.3M | $235.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $226.1M | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $215.9M | $221.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.5M | $-737.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.4M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.2M | $-22.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.9M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $-14.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.0% | 78.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.7% | 77.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.0% | 78.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | 78.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.8% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.4% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.7% | 77.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.0% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | -7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.0% | -4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.5% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.5% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.2% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | -6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.18 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $149.6M | $360.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $297.5M | $248.2M |
| Total Assets | $548.4M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $360.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.6M | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.9M | $383.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.5M | $386.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.2M | $460.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.4M | $577.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.8M | $548.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.3M | $487.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $248.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $297.5M | $326.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.8M | $344.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.9M | $350.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $272.3M | $383.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $400.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.2M | $404.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $238.8M | $363.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $548.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $545.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $524.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $551.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $527.9M | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $16.5M | $88.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.0M | $82.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | 31.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | 62.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $61.7M | $256.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $88.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.1M | $53.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $42.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $87.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.3M | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.5M | $54.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $31.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $82.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.8M | $53.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0M | $38.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $80.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $78.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $53.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.5% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 33.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.4% | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 62.21× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.58× | 23.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 43.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.75× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DAKT
| Live Events Segment | $81.5M | 36% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $41.9M | 18% |
| Limited Configuration | $39.2M | 17% |
| Other | $30.6M | 13% |
| Transportation Segment | $21.3M | 9% |
| Transferred Over Time | $8.8M | 4% |
| Unique Configuration | $6.0M | 3% |
TENB
| Subscription revenue | $243.2M | 93% |
| Perpetual license and maintenance revenue | $10.2M | 4% |
| Other | $8.7M | 3% |
