vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DANA Inc (DAN) and URBAN OUTFITTERS INC (URBN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
URBAN OUTFITTERS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.2× DANA Inc). URBAN OUTFITTERS INC runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs -3.9%, a 11.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, URBAN OUTFITTERS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.3% vs -44.5%). DANA Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($345.0M vs $-22.8M). Over the past eight quarters, URBAN OUTFITTERS INC's revenue compounded faster (1.4% CAGR vs -31.2%).
Dana Incorporated is an American supplier of axles, driveshafts, and electrodynamic, thermal, sealing, and digital equipment for conventional, hybrid, and electric-powered vehicles. The company's products and services are aimed at the light vehicle and commercial vehicle equipment markets. Founded in 1904 and based in Maumee, Ohio, the company employs nearly 28,000 people in 33 countries. In 2022, Dana generated sales of $10.2 billion. The company is included in the Fortune 500.
Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) is a multinational lifestyle retail corporation headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Operating in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, select Western European countries, Poland, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Qatar, the Urban Outfitters brand targets young adults with a merchandise mix of women's and men's fashion apparel, footwear, beauty and wellness products, accessories, activewear and gear, and housewares, as well as music, primarily...
DAN vs URBN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $-50.0M | $116.4M |
| Gross Margin | 6.0% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | 9.4% |
| Net Margin | -3.9% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -44.5% | 12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.5% | 13.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.36 | $1.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $-50.0M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.0M | $143.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $108.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $120.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-80.0M | $102.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $61.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | $47.8M |
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 36.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | 32.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 29.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.5% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.36 | $1.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.64 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.19 | $1.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $1.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.55 | $1.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $1.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.02 | $0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $469.0M | $306.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $840.0M | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $7.8B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.05× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $469.0M | $306.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.0M | $332.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $486.0M | $189.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $507.0M | $290.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $182.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.0M | $209.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $419.0M | $174.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $351.0M | $178.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $840.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $7.8B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.68× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $406.0M | $61.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $345.0M | $-22.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.6% | -1.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.7% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $298.0M | $402.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $406.0M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.0M | $218.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0M | $33.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.0M | $320.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.0M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.0M | $105.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $215.0M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-102.0M | $229.2M |
| Q4 25 | $345.0M | $-22.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.0M | $156.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.0M | $281.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.0M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.0M | $47.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.0M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-172.0M | $180.6M |
| Q4 25 | 26.6% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | 17.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.34× | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.19× | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.48× | 2.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.75× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.44× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | -34.00× | 4.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DAN
| Light Vehicle Segment | $912.0M | 70% |
| Commercial Vehicle Segment | $218.0M | 17% |
| Other | $166.0M | 13% |
URBN
| Apparel | $861.4M | 56% |
| Home | $187.0M | 12% |
| Accessories | $182.6M | 12% |
| Subscription Operations | $144.6M | 9% |
| Wholesale Operations | $88.3M | 6% |
| Other | $65.3M | 4% |
