vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. (DAR) and MERCURY GENERAL CORP (MCY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.0× MERCURY GENERAL CORP). MERCURY GENERAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 1.2%, a 11.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MERCURY GENERAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.5% vs 10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, MERCURY GENERAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (8.6% CAGR vs -1.6%).
Darling Ingredients Inc. is a global sustainable natural ingredients maker that converts edible and inedible organic byproducts into high-value products: food-grade nutritional ingredients, animal feed additives, pharmaceutical raw materials and biofuel components, serving food, agriculture, pharma and renewable energy markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
Mercury General Corporation is a multiple-line insurance organization that offers personal automobiles, homeowners, renters, and business insurance. Mercury's primary focus is automobiles and homeowners' insurance.
DAR vs MCY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $19.4M | $190.4M |
| Gross Margin | 24.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.2% | 12.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.0% | 10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.2% | -36.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.12 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $190.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $202.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $280.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7M | $166.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-26.2M | $-108.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.9M | $101.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $230.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.9M | $62.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 99.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.7% | 99.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | 99.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.6% | 99.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | 99.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | 99.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.5% | 99.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 4.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $5.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $-1.96 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.63 | $1.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $4.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.49 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $91.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.7B | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $10.5B | $9.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.86× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $121.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $575.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $575.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $7.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.89× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.97× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $224.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 11.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $287.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $224.3M | $496.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.8M | $371.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $249.0M | $-68.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.4M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.5M | $318.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.5M | $278.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $273.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $479.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $357.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-81.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $236.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $306.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $266.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.59× | 1.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.52× | 2.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.19× | 1.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.86× | 4.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DAR
| Fats | $428.4M | 27% |
| Food Ingredients | $380.6M | 24% |
| Diamond Green Diesel Holdings Llc Joint Venture | $342.1M | 22% |
| Fuel Ingredients | $154.3M | 10% |
| Used Cooking Oil | $125.9M | 8% |
| Other Rendering | $76.9M | 5% |
| Bakery | $46.9M | 3% |
| Other Products And Services | $12.2M | 1% |
MCY
Segment breakdown not available.
