vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGI) and HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0M vs $1.6M, roughly 1.9× Digital Brands Group, Inc.). HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 14.5% vs -1283.8%, a 1298.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Digital Brands Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-25.1% vs -81.6%). Over the past eight quarters, HeartCore Enterprises, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-5.2% CAGR vs -33.0%).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. is a global SaaS provider specializing in customer experience management, digital transformation solutions, and marketing technology tools. It operates mainly in Japan, Asia-Pacific, and North America, serving small-to-medium businesses and large enterprises with content management systems, marketing automation platforms, and CRM solutions.
DBGI vs HTCR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6M | $3.0M |
| Net Profit | $-20.6M | $434.1K |
| Gross Margin | -77.1% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1385.4% | -0.4% |
| Net Margin | -1283.8% | 14.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -25.1% | -81.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -283.4% | -96.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.73 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-20.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $434.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-683.7K | $-1.3M |
| Q4 25 | -77.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.7% | 49.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | 46.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.6% | 30.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 86.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | 40.3% |
| Q4 25 | -1385.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -201.3% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -88.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -106.7% | -34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -230.1% | 386.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -112.4% | 76.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | -37.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | -13.5% |
| Q4 25 | -1283.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -208.7% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -94.1% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -111.7% | -86.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.7% | 346.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -145.1% | 68.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -103.4% | -48.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.1% | -26.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.73 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.18 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.81 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.92 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.02 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-81.53 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-104.18 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.02 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9M | $4.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.1M | $510.9K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.8M | $5.2M |
| Total Assets | $44.5M | $13.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.70× | 0.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $542.6K | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.4K | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.3K | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8K | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3K | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $510.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | $545.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0K | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $24.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.8M | $22.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.50× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-674.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-837.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $-898.6K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DBGI
Segment breakdown not available.
HTCR
| Customised Software Development And Services | $1.7M | 58% |
| Software Related Cost Of Revenues | $1.4M | 46% |
