vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGI) and PLUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (PSTV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Brands Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6M vs $1.4M, roughly 1.2× PLUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.). PLUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -417.9% vs -1283.8%, a 865.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PLUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.2% vs -25.1%). Over the past eight quarters, PLUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-9.7% CAGR vs -33.0%).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
Plus Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company headquartered in Houston, Texas, that develops targeted radiotherapeutics and diagnostic services for brain and central nervous system (CNS) cancers. The company’s lead therapeutic candidate, marketed as REYOBIQ™, is an investigational liposomal radiopharmaceutical under clinical evaluation for recurrent glioblastoma, leptomeningeal metastases, and certain pediatric brain cancers. Plus Therapeutics also commercialized a molecu...
DBGI vs PSTV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6M | $1.4M |
| Net Profit | $-20.6M | $-5.7M |
| Gross Margin | -77.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1385.4% | -420.0% |
| Net Margin | -1283.8% | -417.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -25.1% | -3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -283.4% | -46.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.73 | $0.95 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-20.6M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-683.7K | $-3.3M |
| Q4 25 | -77.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1385.4% | -420.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -201.3% | -320.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -88.2% | -110.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -106.7% | -333.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -230.1% | -276.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -112.4% | -260.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | -289.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | -196.7% |
| Q4 25 | -1283.8% | -417.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -208.7% | -316.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -94.1% | 370.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -111.7% | -1643.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.7% | -276.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -145.1% | -197.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -103.4% | -229.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.1% | -194.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.73 | $0.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.18 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.81 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.92 | $-1.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.02 | $-0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-81.53 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-104.18 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.02 | $-0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9M | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.8M | $4.0M |
| Total Assets | $44.5M | $16.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.70× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $542.6K | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.4K | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.3K | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8K | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3K | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.8M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $-23.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0K | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.8M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.7M | $-6.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-6.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -459.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-20.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.7M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.5M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $-4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -459.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -184.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -417.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -583.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -86.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.2% | -253.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.9% | -96.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.1% | -271.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
