vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGI) and Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Brands Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6M vs $881.5K, roughly 1.8× Serve Robotics Inc.). Digital Brands Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1283.8% vs -3888.1%, a 2604.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Serve Robotics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (400.1% vs -25.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Serve Robotics Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-3.5% CAGR vs -33.0%).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
Ecovacs Robotics is a Chinese technology company. It is best known for developing in-home robotic appliances. The company was founded in 1998 by Qian Dongqi and is headquartered in Suzhou, China. According to Global Asia, Ecovacs Robotics had more than 60% of the Chinese market for robots by 2013. In 2023, Nikkei Asia had reported that the market capitalisation of Ecovacs Robotics has grown to near $6.38 billion, which is "roughly 5 times" that of the market capitalisation of rivalling US bas...
DBGI vs SERV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6M | $881.5K |
| Net Profit | $-20.6M | $-34.3M |
| Gross Margin | -77.1% | -757.3% |
| Operating Margin | -1385.4% | -4572.1% |
| Net Margin | -1283.8% | -3888.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -25.1% | 400.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -283.4% | -161.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.73 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $881.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $687.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $642.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $440.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $176.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $222.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $468.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $946.7K |
| Q4 25 | $-20.6M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-683.7K | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | -77.1% | -757.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.7% | -637.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | -445.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.6% | -333.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.3% | -371.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | -70.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.9% | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | 62.8% |
| Q4 25 | -1385.4% | -4572.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -201.3% | -5067.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -88.2% | -3527.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -106.7% | -3406.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -230.1% | -7701.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -112.4% | -3804.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | -1828.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | -814.6% |
| Q4 25 | -1283.8% | -3888.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -208.7% | -4806.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -94.1% | -3247.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -111.7% | -3000.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.7% | -7441.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -145.1% | -3601.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -103.4% | -1931.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.1% | -954.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.73 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.18 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.81 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.92 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.02 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-81.53 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-104.18 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.02 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9M | $106.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.8M | $350.7M |
| Total Assets | $44.5M | $367.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.70× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $116.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $542.6K | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $197.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.4K | $123.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.3K | $50.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8K | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3K | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.8M | $350.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | $283.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $207.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $210.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $131.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0K | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | $367.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $299.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $216.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $139.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $32.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.8M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.7M | $-29.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-46.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5234.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1872.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.7M | $-29.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.5M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-46.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -5234.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5314.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3426.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2934.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6307.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.2% | -4529.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.9% | -1396.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.1% | -431.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1872.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1649.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 940.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 785.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2755.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 2070.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 169.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 0.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
