vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGI) and VirTra, Inc (VTSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VirTra, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9M vs $1.6M, roughly 1.8× Digital Brands Group, Inc.). VirTra, Inc runs the higher net margin — -27.2% vs -1283.8%, a 1256.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Digital Brands Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-25.1% vs -46.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Digital Brands Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-33.0% CAGR vs -37.0%).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
VirTra, Inc. is a global provider of highly realistic immersive training simulators and supporting curriculum, primarily serving law enforcement agencies, military units, and public safety organizations. Its scenario-based training systems are designed to enhance frontline personnel's decision-making, de-escalation skills, and on-duty operational safety.
DBGI vs VTSI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6M | $2.9M |
| Net Profit | $-20.6M | $-792.4K |
| Gross Margin | -77.1% | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1385.4% | -47.9% |
| Net Margin | -1283.8% | -27.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -25.1% | -46.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -283.4% | 10.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.73 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-20.6M | $-792.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $-388.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $175.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $-888.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | $583.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-683.7K | $468.2K |
| Q4 25 | -77.1% | 57.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.7% | 65.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.6% | 72.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.3% | 67.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 73.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.9% | 90.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | 64.2% |
| Q4 25 | -1385.4% | -47.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -201.3% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -88.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -106.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -230.1% | -9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -112.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | -1283.8% | -27.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -208.7% | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -94.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -111.7% | 17.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.7% | -16.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -145.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -103.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.1% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.73 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.18 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.81 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.92 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.02 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-81.53 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-104.18 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.02 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9M | $18.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.1M | $7.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.8M | $45.6M |
| Total Assets | $44.5M | $65.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.70× | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $542.6K | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $17.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.4K | $18.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.3K | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8K | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3K | $22.4M |
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.8M | $45.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | $46.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $46.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $46.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0K | $45.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $44.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | $43.5M |
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | $65.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $67.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $66.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.8M | $69.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.7M | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -72.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 21.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $2.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.7M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $36.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.5M | $65.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $-908.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | $897.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-61.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-362.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | $814.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -72.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.9% | -64.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.1% | 48.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 21.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
