vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DigitalBridge Group, Inc. (DBRG) and Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. (PPIH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DigitalBridge Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($105.7M vs $61.1M, roughly 1.7× Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.). DigitalBridge Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 61.5% vs 10.3%, a 51.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (47.1% vs 4.1%). DigitalBridge Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($258.0M vs $12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (23.4% CAGR vs 19.2%).
DigitalBridge Group, Inc. is a global digital infrastructure investment firm. The company owns, invests in and operates businesses such as cell towers, data centers, fiber, small cells, and edge infrastructure. Headquartered in Boca Raton, DigitalBridge has offices in Los Angeles, New York, Denver, London, and Singapore. As of June 2025, DigitalBridge had US$106 billion of assets under management.
Perma-Pipe International Holdings, Inc. designs, manufactures and supplies pre-insulated piping systems and integrated leak detection solutions. Its offerings cater to oil & gas, district heating and cooling, industrial, and municipal infrastructure segments, with a global footprint spanning North America, the Middle East, Europe and Asia.
DBRG vs PPIH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $105.7M | $61.1M |
| Net Profit | $65.1M | $6.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | 61.5% | 10.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.1% | 47.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 153.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.28 | $0.77 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $105.7M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.3M | $47.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.3M | $46.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.1M | $45.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.6M | $41.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.6M | $37.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $390.3M | $34.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.4M | $40.2M |
| Q4 25 | $65.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $851.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.6M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.8M | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.4M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.6M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -31.2% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.4% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.7% | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | 61.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.8% | 21.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.28 | $0.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.61 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.44 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.28 | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $382.5M | $27.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $298.8M | $12.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $85.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $217.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.14× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $382.5M | $27.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.4M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $340.7M | $18.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $349.9M | $15.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.2M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $294.4M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.2M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $247.4M | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | $298.8M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $327.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $298.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.9M | $15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $295.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $366.5M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $85.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $77.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $72.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $71.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $68.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $65.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $217.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $189.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $178.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $165.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $160.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $157.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $155.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $155.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.14× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.15× | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.20× | 0.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $259.3M | $17.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $258.0M | $12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 244.0% | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 8.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.99× | 2.74× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $440.5M | $12.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $259.3M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.0M | $733.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.3M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.1M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.9M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.5M | $-73.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.0M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $258.0M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.1M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.4M | $-194.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.5M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.3M | $-662.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-30.1M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | 244.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.2% | -9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.5% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -40.4% | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 7.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.99× | 2.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.80× | -2.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.43× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.65× | 3.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.25× | -0.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.82× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
