vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Currency X Technology Inc. (DCX) and Empery Digital Inc. (EMPD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Empery Digital Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17291.1% vs -6685.8%, a 23977.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Digital Currency X Technology Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-82.4% vs -171.0%).
Digital Currency Group Inc. (DCG) is a venture capital company focusing on the digital currency market. It is located in Stamford, Connecticut. The company has the subsidiaries Foundry, Grayscale Investments, and Luno. It also formerly owned CoinDesk and Genesis.
DCX vs EMPD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $599.0K | $-662.3K |
| Net Profit | $-40.0M | $-114.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -11406.2% | 17004.2% |
| Net Margin | -6685.8% | 17291.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -82.4% | -171.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -85.2% | -2095.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.73 | $1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $-662.3K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $198.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $599.0K | $702.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $736.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $933.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $940.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-114.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-29.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.0M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.6M | $-606.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -217.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -856.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -230.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -56.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17004.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -17388.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11406.2% | -550.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -340.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -401.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1127.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -792.0% | -587.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -410.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17291.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -14710.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6685.8% | -554.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -334.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -559.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1267.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -634.6% | -64.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2520.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.73 | $-7.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1727.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-191.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.99 | $-96.59 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2615.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.6M | $9.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $34.5K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-179.6M | $269.2M |
| Total Assets | $490.9M | $372.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.6M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $34.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $40.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $45.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $53.6K |
| Q4 25 | — | $269.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $437.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-179.6M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-154.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $372.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $492.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $490.9M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.3M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.01× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6M | $-3.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 452.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | -0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-18.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.3M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 452.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3844.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -521.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -512.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -407.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -380.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -508.4% | -401.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -452.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
