vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DuPont (DD) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Science Applications International Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.1× DuPont). DuPont runs the higher net margin — 9.8% vs 4.2%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DuPont posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Science Applications International Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs -27.2%).
DuPont de Nemours, Inc., commonly shortened to DuPont, is an American multinational chemical company first formed in 1802 by French-American chemist and industrialist Éleuthère Irénée du Pont de Nemours. The company played a major role in the development of the U.S. state of Delaware and first arose as a major supplier of gunpowder.
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
DD vs SAIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $164.0M | $78.0M |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 9.8% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -3.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.36 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $164.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-126.0M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-123.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.0M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-589.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.0M | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $454.0M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.0M | $77.0M |
| Q1 26 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.1% | 11.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.30 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.29 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.41 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.28 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.08 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $710.0M | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.2B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $21.4B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | 1.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $710.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $715.0M | $45.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $49.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.3B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $21.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.6B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.6B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.23× | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.23× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.30× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $129.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $120.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.1% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $478.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-700.0M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $497.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $381.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $382.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $564.0M | $143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $527.0M | $98.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-850.0M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $379.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $403.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.0M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $425.0M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.4% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.46× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.62× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.96× | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DD
Segment breakdown not available.
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
