vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DDC Enterprise Ltd (DDC) and Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. (FHTX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.2M vs $5.4M, roughly 1.7× DDC Enterprise Ltd). DDC Enterprise Ltd runs the higher net margin — -123.3% vs -234.3%, a 110.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company dedicated to developing novel therapies targeting the chromatin regulatory system to treat various types of cancer and other severe diseases. It advances a diverse pipeline of targeted drug candidates, conducting internal R&D and strategic partnerships to serve global patient populations.
DDC vs FHTX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4M | $9.2M |
| Net Profit | $-6.7M | $-21.7M |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -90.0% | -258.2% |
| Net Margin | -123.3% | -234.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 223.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -11.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.7M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-15.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $715.3K | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-19.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-23.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-25.0M |
| Q4 25 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -90.0% | -258.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -226.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | -279.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -385.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -840.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -305.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -386.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -558.3% |
| Q4 25 | -123.3% | -234.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -194.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | -237.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -316.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -682.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -244.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -333.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -495.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $21.7M | $80.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $610.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $71.2M | $-108.5M |
| Total Assets | $199.6M | $198.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $21.7M | $80.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $72.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $138.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $79.3M |
| Q4 25 | $610.8K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $71.2M | $-108.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-89.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $-76.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-61.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-45.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-28.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-97.5M |
| Q4 25 | $199.6M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $205.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $226.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $258.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $284.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $308.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $328.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $255.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-39.7M | $-22.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-39.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -734.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-39.7M | $-22.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-24.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-24.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-29.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-39.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-24.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-21.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-29.4M |
| Q4 25 | -734.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -278.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -403.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -875.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -273.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -371.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -583.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.