vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DDC Enterprise Ltd (DDC) and Osisko Development Corp. (ODV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Osisko Development Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($10.4M vs $5.4M, roughly 1.9× DDC Enterprise Ltd).
Osisko Development Corp. is a Canada-based mining exploration and development firm focused on high-grade gold and precious metal assets. It holds North American mineral projects, advancing them through exploration, feasibility study, and pre-production phases while adhering to sustainable mining standards.
DDC vs ODV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4M | $10.4M |
| Net Profit | $-6.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 3.2% |
| Operating Margin | -90.0% | -149.3% |
| Net Margin | -123.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $4.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $715.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-23.8M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $-76.8M |
| Q4 25 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -90.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -149.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -124.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -241.5% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -1940.8% |
| Q4 25 | -123.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -108.2% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -1641.7% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $21.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $610.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $71.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $199.6M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $21.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $610.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $71.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $199.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-39.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-39.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -734.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-39.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-39.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -734.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
