vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 3D SYSTEMS CORP (DDD) and MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. (MMLP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($187.7M vs $106.3M, roughly 1.8× 3D SYSTEMS CORP). MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs -18.4%, a 20.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.5% vs -4.3%). MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-6.0M vs $-16.6M). Over the past eight quarters, 3D SYSTEMS CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.6% CAGR vs 0.8%).
3D Systems Corporation is an American company based in Rock Hill, South Carolina, that engineers, manufactures, and sells 3D printers, 3D printing materials, 3D printed parts, and application engineering services. The company creates product concept models, precision and functional prototypes, master patterns for tooling, as well as production parts for direct digital manufacturing. It uses proprietary processes to fabricate physical objects using input from computer-aided design and manufact...
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. is a U.S.-based midstream energy services provider. It offers storage, transportation, distribution and processing solutions for crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined petroleum products and specialty chemicals, mainly serving customers across North American energy and industrial segments.
DDD vs MMLP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $106.3M | $187.7M |
| Net Profit | $-19.5M | $3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 30.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -21.3% | 4.1% |
| Net Margin | -18.4% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.3% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 41.7% | -37.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $187.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.3M | $174.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $168.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.8M | $180.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.5M | $192.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.0M | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.9M | $170.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.3M | $184.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-19.5M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.4M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.0M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.5M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-178.6M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.3M | $3.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.8% | 57.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 55.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.1% | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.6% | 53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.0% | 58.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.9% | 58.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.6% | 58.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -21.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -38.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -160.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.3% | 10.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -18.4% | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.8% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 110.1% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.1% | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.1% | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -158.2% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.1% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.26 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.35 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $240.4M | — |
| Total Assets | $521.7M | $537.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $95.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $192.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $428.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $441.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $427.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $451.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $437.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $469.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $439.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $240.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $221.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $241.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $218.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $537.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $521.7M | $522.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $554.5M | $510.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $587.8M | $515.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $583.4M | $533.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $608.8M | $538.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $658.3M | $554.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $821.5M | $535.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.6M | $-6.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.7% | -3.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-97.8M | $27.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.7M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.8M | $30.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.8M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-801.0K | $-15.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.8M | $11.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-16.6M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.8M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.8M | $25.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-36.6M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.1M | $34.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.4M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.7M | $-696.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.7% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.3% | -4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -38.7% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.8% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.9% | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | -0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DDD
| Products | $62.6M | 59% |
| Services | $43.7M | 41% |
MMLP
| Specialty products | $61.6M | 33% |
| Transportation * | $52.8M | 28% |
| Other | $46.5M | 25% |
| Terminalling and storage * | $22.4M | 12% |
| Sulfur services | $4.4M | 2% |
